|
DO YOU KNOW?
THE
EUROPEAN UNION
COLLECTIVE
IS THE
Enemy of its
Member State
www.edwardharle.com
THE WORLD'S
LARGEST POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
The European Union
is a political collective. It is
manifestly a tautology and a truism that in a
collective of any kind, decisions are taken
collectively. By definition.
, collectivism
inevitably tends towards oppression,
since those whose
views do not prevail are required by virtue of their
membership of the
COLLECTIVE,
as a whole, by
whatever technical means these decisions may
actually be reached.
Since the political
collective has been imposed upon the European
populations by a combination of
RIGGED REFERENDA
diktat
and deceit,
all the EU Member
countries populations are, and feel,
OPPRESSED.
The present level
of opposition is, however, nothing to what lies in
store. Even as the Author [Christopher Story of
www.worldreports.org
] was
putting the finishing touches to this text, he was
informed, only semi-mockingly, that because of his
'obdurate' refusal to accept the
'politically
correct'
view of the
European Utopia, he should anticipate
'having your toe-and fingernails extracted by
red-hot tongs'.
The decisions of
the institutions of the European Union Collective
are usually
DECEITFUL
and TOTALITARIAN
in character.
On technique, a
general proxy for the collectivist
'decision
making'
methodology
employed by the European Union's
undemocratic
institutions
masquerades as
'consensus
building'
and will be
familiar to anyone who has had the misfortune to
attend a
'visioning
meeting' a 'stockholder'
council or similar
socialistic mind-control-orientated conference.
Consensus-building
does not involve actually
convincing
anyone to alter his or her views.
On the contrary, it
avoids and disposes of conflicting views -beginning
and ending with a predetermined position, which
may or may not be made known to the group. Consensus
-building, a revolutionary technique developed by
Leninist strategic planners, is implemented by
trained
'facilitators'
who ask questions
designed to elicit
SILENCE
or else to force
individuals who might be opposed to a given policy,
to identify themselves. In the unusual event
that the lone objector gains the upper hand in the
forum, he or she is usually silenced by the means of
slogans, aggressive responses and counter
allegations - such as that the said antagonist is
engaged in
'type-casting' or 'finger-pointing'
These were. in
fact, elements of a torrent of gratuitous invective
directed at the Author during a press conference at
the IMF/World
Bank Annual Meeting
in
PRAGUE
in
September 2000,
by Mary Robinson
the ex President of Ireland and later the
UN High
Commissioner for Refugees.
Facilitators do not ask if
everyone agrees (which would encourage everyone
to start talking), but ask if there is anyone who
does not agree with the predetermined position
-which usually encourages everyone to stay SILENT
since most people fear (irrationally) what their
peers may think of THEM. Moreover questions at
such meetings are typically phrased so that they
appear to express an idea universally thought to be
good, or else generally felt to be bad. In the
environmental context (a dimension of revolutionary
operations in which the continuing revolution is
heavily invested, given its underlying anti-property
and 'population reduction'
intentions) , a
facilitator might ask: 'Does anyone think we should
not be concerned about the future wellbeing of our
species?' The
underlying deception principle here is that it is
almost impossible to prove that a consensus on such
a predetermined issue does not exist.
Thus the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change {IPCC}
declared at one stage that a consensus among 2,000
scientists had determined that
GLOBAL WARMING WAS CAUSED BY HUMAN
ACTIVITY -a
dubious point of view
STRONGLY
DENIED
by much authoritative
EXPERT OPINION.
But the so-called' consensus
stands firm in the public perception (as was
intended by Soviet intelligence since this
initiative was launched at the
27th CONGRESS of the
COMMUNIST PARTY
in
1986)
despite the vocal no-concurrence of
thousands of scientists.
When asked why the alleged consensus
had
NOT BEEN VALIDATED
even by means of a straw vote,
Michael Cujatar, Executive Secretary of the
Conference of Parties, replied:
'Consensus is not unanimity: it is
very much up to the president' This
cynical, arrogant totalitarian, collectivist and
anti-democrat attitude is routinely encountered in
the European Union context.
[TO BE CONTINUED]
NOVEMBER - 2008
HOME |