EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED
October, 2005- London.
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE
THIS ILLEGAL ‘FESTERING
DUSTBIN OF CORRUPTION’ TOMORROW
The European Union
Collective is illegal and so extensively criminalized that it has become all but
indistinguishable from a criminal
It is illegal because key EU treaties were
procured by means of slush fund payments.
It is criminal
because, being born in corruption, its procedures are designed to mask the
corrupt activities of many of its officials, while it publishes false accounts.
Britain is free to leave immediately, as
findings are published today the 10th October, 2005 in the latest
issue of International Currency Review, the London -based Journal
of the International Financial Community.
fraudulence of the European Commission’s accounts necessitates urgent
consideration of its Triple-A Credit Rating by the leading Rating Agencies.
Precise evidence of the fraudulence of the EC’s accounts is presented in the
this scandalous state of affairs is ‘successfully’ shoved under the carpet).
Currency Review has advised the agencies accordingly, and anticipates that they
will carry out the necessary overdue reassessment of the EU’s ‘integrity’. In the event that zero action is taken,
given the extreme gravity of the evidence of institutionalised accounting fraud
presented in the journal, the integrity of the
Credit Rating Agencies themselves may be called into question - not
least by International Currency Review.
This may have repercussions
for the International Financial Community generally.
WHY THE EUROPEAN
UNION IS ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE
first things first. The illegitimacy and illegality of the European Union-and thus of ALL
its constituent structures, including the European Central Bank - arises from
the following facts:
The British Treaty of Accession was signed by two agents of the
German ‘Black’ Nazi intelligence continuum, DVD -This is the ultra-secret
German Nazi continuing ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based,
appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich.
Intelligence concerning the
existence was passed to the Editor of International Currency
Review: Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst
worldreports.org Telephone +44-(0) 20-7222 3836
Editor then had its contents checked out by
high -level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the
entity’s existence and importance.
remains some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for-
alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or
else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency]
- the context here being that DVD is the intelligence [Abwehr]
continuum of the
established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in
Madrid in 1942.
Therefore, in this context,
‘insurance’ would mean ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring
the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the controlling
While ‘defence’ in this same context would mean
‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy.
funded by the German Government and Taxpayer, since it operates its own covert
sources of giga-finance; but its primary operations and
strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery.
Any official denial of this
fact is a lie
signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial
financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath
and Geoffrey Rippon. Together
with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited
by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford.
This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward
Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen
with a title]
THE E.U. TREATIES
ARE ROUTINELY PROCURED BY FRAUDULENT MEANS:
That is to say, official signatories and senior
policymakers/operatives have received substantial corrupt payments, remitted to
their secret offshore bank accounts, in exchange for their ‘co-operation’ in
pushing through successive E.U. Treaties.
bribery funds are derived from a colossal secret ‘Black Operations’ slush
fund account located in Switzerland -the title and
size of which is divulged in the REPORT.
$5.0 billion was allocated in 2004 from the secret Swiss slush fund
to ‘procure’ the European
Constitution Treaty, divided into two branches:
$2.5 billion was allocated (and paid out) on completion of the Inter
Governmental Conference [IGC], in July/August of 2004, with $100 million
allocated for each of the 25 EU’Member States’. The corrupt bribery funds were
remitted to the National officials concerned in Euros.
further $2.5 billion ($100 million for each ‘Member State’) was payable on
ratification of the Collective Treaty.
Given the negative referendum results
delivered by the French and Dutch electorates, payment of the second branch has
been a matter of understandable tension and contention ever since, not least
since such ‘Black’ remittances,
which are common place at the intergovernmental level are illegal -and therefore
Intelligence sources have provided
International Currency Review with the NAME of the secret Swiss bank account,
the vast amount of ‘Black’ money it holds, the amounts allocated for each
corrupted EU ‘Member State’, plus the
names of three of the most prominent alleged recipients of ‘Black’ payments, together with details of
the alleged transactions concerned.
[WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK BUT THIS REPORT MUST PUT THE
PRO-EUROPE FACTION LITERALLY IN A SPIN AND FEAR OF THE OUTCOME WHEN THE
CONSPIRACY IS FULLY REVEALED]
We have more to follow
EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD HEATH
These revelations have become
possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German
agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence
penetration in modern history.
It is significant that the
extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th
July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:
‘He [Heath] remained determined
that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.
This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in
2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his
visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers
warned him that
intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.
It is reported that, on hearing this,
Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.
A similar fate attended the
demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack
when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be
exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.
Roy Jenkins was
one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest
levels of the British Government.
-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late
Lord Jenkins’ protégé.
Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were
far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the
successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.
In the United States, the Dulles brothers were
German agents to this day. Substantial
transfers of ‘Black’ Operations’ funds
originally controlled by the United States authorities are known to have been
transferred into the hands of the German ‘Black’ covert intelligence
CIA is belatedly being to some extent purged of operators with
ethnic and other loyalties and ties to Germany.
EXIST WITHIN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITIES BECAUSE OF THIS PENETRATION
THE 1969 VIENNA
CONVENTION ON TREATIES.
The United Kingdom’s EEC Accession Treaty,
The Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and
(aborted) European Constitution Treaty were among E.U. bilateral and
collective Treaties that were procured by corrupt and fraudulent means,
UNION IS AN ILLEGAL ORGANISATION.
This is because Article 49 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on
Treaties, to which Britain and the other EU
‘Member States’ are parties, provides as follows:
‘If a State has
been induced to conclude a Treaty by the fraudulent conduct of another
negotiating State, that State may invoke the fraud as invalidating its consent
to be bound by the Treaty.
[* The first tranche of
corrupt payments for the European Constitution Treaty was paid out, but the
fate of the second tranche, given the negative French and Dutch referenda
outcomes, is uncertain - as well as being the subject of vicious secret controversy]
According to intelligence
sources, earlier EU Collective treaties were likewise procured by fraudulent
In the British case, UK Membership of the
European Union Collective -an illegal organisation which exists to subsume,
usurp and collectivise national sovereignty under the enticing cover of ‘co-operation’ (code for collectivisation)-contravenes
Bill of Rights which remains the LAW of the United Kingdom to this day and
which incorporates the following Oath:
‘I do declare that no
foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have
jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority with this Realm’
WHY THE EUROPEAN
UNION IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION
In addition to exposing the illegality and illegitimacy of the
European Union as a whole,
International Currency Review
demonstrates, with extensive analysis and documentation, that
Commission is a criminal organisation.
The issue has been prepared in close collaboration with Ashley
Mote, -Independent MEP for Southeast England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk] and Continental
MEP colleagues. In October 2004,
Mr Mote and Marta Andreason, the former Chief Accountant of the European
Commission, presented the UK Serious Fraud Office with two large lever-arch
files containing voluminous damning information about institutionalised
corruption in the EU Commission and related EU structures.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN
[Does the stink of
corruption in high places prevent the Rule of Law from taking place?]
Among the reasons for concluding that the European Union is a
criminal organisation, are the following:
Because successive Presidents of the European Union preside over the
disbursement of the corrupt ‘Black’
‘facilitation fees’ identified, each successive (six-monthly) President
is and has been aware of the corrupt mechanism used to procure the EU’s
successive collective Treaties.
The incidence of fraud committed within the EU’s structures is so
extensive and routine, that the European Commission has been condemned as
openly condoning a ‘culture of corruption’, and presiding over a system
of ‘institutional looting’. Scandalised
EC whistle blowing officials refer to the European Commission as a ‘festering
dustbin of corruption’. In 2004, there were nearly 3,500 cases of EC fraud.
When informed in 2004 that the EC Vice - President-designate, Jacques
Barrot, had been convicted for embezzlement of funds, and had
withheld this information from the European Commission’s President-designate, Sr.
Jose-Manuel Barroso, the new President denied any prior knowledge of this
fact, and left Barrot in place.
It is nothing unusual for European Commission officials to be
associated with lucrative corrupt ‘side businesses’-often using offshore
accounts-from which they benefit financially, consequent upon contracts
being awarded to the businesses in which they themselves have a secret
pecuniary interest. For instance:
The Sunday Telegraph reported on 25th September -2005 that
two EC employees own a Brussels sex hotel, Studio Europe, which rents out rooms
for 13 euros an hour. No doubt this location is used for blackmail
purposes. The EC officials in question
were named as Carmela lo Guidance, an assistant in the EC Budget
Directorate-General and George Tizzies a porter in the
Directorate-General responsible for employment. This is the latest of innumerable EC scandals to have erupted
into the public domain, some of which are examined in the Special Issue [out
on Monday 10th October 2005.]
Unhealthy and evidently pervasive masonic links exist between European
Commission officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy
The European Commission’s accounting is NOT only shambolic, but also fraudulent. Evidence to this effect is
presented, inter alia, by the well-known British forensic accountant Christopher
Arkell, FTCA, and by former Chief Accountant of the European
Commission, Marta Andreason. She
was ‘suspended’ after five months en
poste, and then fired, after she questioned the legitimacy of payments that
Directorates-General required her to authorise. She asked awkward questions, and was
effectively told to ‘shut up and just sign’.
The EC’s accounting irregularities, which are glaring, include the
following abuses: When certain accounting
modifications were implemented at the end of 2004, the closing balances in 2004
and the opening balances in 2005 were not reconciled- thereby
permanently embedding false accounting data for the future. This means that
henceforth no European Commission accounts can ever be accurate (not that this
has ever been the case).
en though EU ‘Member
States’ have been making payments to the Commission for decades to cover the
costs of pension liabilities for approximately 39,000 EC employees (as of 2005), the EU ‘Member
States’ have simultaneously been charged with the liability of
making/guaranteeing the resulting pension payments. Thus pension liabilities appear on both sides of the balance sheet. Proper accounting practice
would require a charge to the Income and Expenditure Account of
EUR 19.5 billion
And a consequent reduction in reserves.
Commission should have been acquiring a liability for pensions throughout its
existence instead of fudging the accounts in this fraudulent and irregular
Commission ‘makes’ massive surpluses out of the ‘Member States’ annually, which
it covers up
are supposed according to the EU’s own regulations, to be returned to the
‘Member States’. What happens in practice
is that the EC surpluses that have arisen after all accruals have been
accounted for, are eliminated by the simple manipulative expedient of providing
for potential expenditures not openly through the Income and Expenditure
Account, but by means of corrupt adjustments to the Balance Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method of accounting is prohibited by all recognised accounting
standards around the world as DISHONEST.
Its use by the European Commission
represents a clear fraud perpetuated upon ‘Member States’ and their troubled
and exploited peoples.
EC accounting records can be changed two or more
years in arrears. The amount and the payee,
but not the unique identifying number, can be altered, and no record whatsoever
of such changes is/has been maintained in the records. This represents
an open-ended invitation to scam the system, especially as it is routine for
the EC’s Annual Accounts to be adjusted retrospectively.
The huge Eurocracy (or
self-interested EU nomenklatura) has perfected subtle mechanisms for ensuring that hardly anything is ever done to stamp out
the corruption over which it has presided for decades. These techniques
include, but are not confined to the following:
The use of ‘candour’,
which is NOT to be confused
with the truth. ‘Candour’ is deployed in order to disarm, mislead, divert and
mollify critics, so that any underlying fraud goes
8.2) What happens is that
several investigations are ‘opened’ separately. Further internal ‘investigations’ may
follow. Some are then ‘closed’,
or ‘suspended’, ostensibly
‘pending’ the ‘results’ of other investigations.
deliberately contrived, confusion, with successive reports contradicting
others, ensures that the corruption trail is buried and lost.
Report-writing is used to
smother transparency, clarity, and TRUTH, with the sole objective of
obfuscating the underlying looting and corruption.
8.3) The EC and its structures have at least 3,094 secret ‘working groups’ or committees, all of which are answerable to no-one, and the operations of
which are secret.
The main objective of any EC fraud investigation is to procure that the
case is ‘exported’ as quickly as possible to the ‘Member States’ concerned, so
that any corruption at the EC centre is consequently hidden from scrutiny.
Wherever possible, investigations are kept unresolved until the
existing Commission is duly replaced by its successor-when the ‘that was then, this is now’ excuse kicks in.
Innumerable other deliberate
obstruction methods, identified by International
Currency Review with the guidance of Ashley Mote MEP and his
colleagues, are routinely employed by the EC and related structures, to
maximise the obfuscation of troubling problems.
instance, one external corporation, based in Luxembourg, in which EC
officials had an interest, was ostensibly established on 29th February 1989-a date which never even existed, which meant
that the entity was ‘invisible’.
When a sanitised official report on the entity’s
fraudulent activities was presented to the former President of the European
Commission, Signor Romano Prodi - that allegedly corrupt Italian ‘machine’
politician- the date was altered to
This further illustrated the
devious standard European Commission technique of promulgating conflicting
information in separate contradictory reports.
By this means, controversy is deflected into sterile arguments over the
conflicting information-diverting attention from the institutionalised internal
The European Court of Auditors has given an adverse
opinion for many years, on 95% of all European Commission Expenditure.
It has never, ever, approved
the EC’s accounts.
Furthermore evidence has surfaced of fraud in the Court’s
own accounts -one of several indications that the Court itself cannot be
trusted. Indeed, like the Commission’s
own internal Audit Service, its main task, by open official admission, is to
minimise embarrassment to the Commission.
evidence of institutionalised European Commission looting and serial corruption
covered up by the EC authorities contained in the single issue of International
Currency Review is sufficient to induce a terminal crisis at the European
WHY BRITISH PAYMENTS TO THE EC MUST CEASE FORTHWITH.
Both Ashley Mote MEP and the journal’s Editor, Christopher Story, demand that the
UK Treasury sits up, finally takes notice, and withholds further contributions
to the EC budget pending elimination of institutionalised corruption and
looting in the European Commission’s structures -
which will never happen.
In a letter to Ashley Mote dated 22nd
October 2004, Stephen Timms, the Treasury Minister, told the MEP that
withholding British payments to the EC would be illegal and would be an ‘option’ we would not
Continued squandering of UK
Taxpayers (OUR MONEY) represents a dereliction by British Ministers and their
officials, of their duty of care towards UK taxpayer’s funds.
Given the conspicuous
gravity of the situation, Ministers are believed to be increasing the risk of
being sued for negligence as exposures of the European Commission’s ‘culture of
[At this moment in Time in the UK millions of
people on tax-credits who were overpaid because of technical problems are being
asked to hand the money back. They
should ALL insist that the Treasury should try the European
Commission and ask their employees to point the finger and explain were the
billions of pounds of OUR money is resting in banks in Switzerland. WE should certainly have a great deal of
compound interest to collect at the same time]
Moreover the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord
Lawson of Blaby, has advised the House of Lords’ European Committee that
the British Government DOES possess the legal scope to give
itself powers to withhold payments to the European Commission.
He told the Committee:
have to remember how hard it was to win the (UK) rebate…It would never have
happened if we had not made clear that if we did not get satisfaction, we would
withhold our contributions.
It was never published, but it was printed. It was
discreetly known to those who we negotiated with, that this is what would
happen if we did not get satisfaction….Without that threat to withhold our
contributions, to the extent of having the UK law officers produce a bill, we
would have NOT got [the Rebate].’
[Source: Future Financing of the European Union, House
of Lords European Committee, HL Paper 62, 9th March 2005.]
But since Britain’s EU membership is illegal, because the UK
Accession Treaty and successive EU Collective Treaties (notably Maastricht)
were procured by fraud, it is not even technically necessary for the Government
to extract that draft bill from the official pigeon-hole into which it was
BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TOMORROW: NO PROBLEM.
The Government can walk away from the European Union
Tomorrow- and use the 25% of gross Domestic Product represented by all
current and future costs of the EU membership:
To rebuild the Public Transportation system.
Build spanking new ‘Schools and Hospitals’ wherever demand
And revitalise the BRITISH economy generally.
All without suffering any losses since EU membership has
brought Britain no clear benefits at all, that could not have been procured
domestically. It has however, meant
that billions of UK taxpayers’ funds that the British Government should have
been spending at home, have been squandered on this sterile, decaying
collectivist project, led by corrupted and blackmailed politicians and
All EU ‘Member
States’, valuing the huge British market for their goods, would be
compelled to negotiate arms’-length bilateral trade and other agreements with
the United Kingdom, or risk losing access to UK markets. Any prospective
interim disruptions could be accommodated by the British Government directing
the UK taxpayers’ funds that it normally squanders with the EC’s ‘festering
dustbin of corruption’, into temporarily vulnerable sectors of the UK economy.
A Free Trade
Agreement linking Britain, the United States and Canada has bee readied, for
implementation when Britain leaves the European Community.
For, contrary to what is in
the public domain, contingency plans do exist in the United Kingdom to leave
the European Union.
These were recently reviewed and
‘dusted down’, in the context of key connections made by certain intelligence
circles following the 7/7 attacks, which have shown that EU Member States’ that
profess to be allies of the United Kingdom
are anything but.
Exposure information for this
special issue of International Currency Review
No4] has been developed with the generous practical assistance
of Ashley Mote MEP. Paul van Buitenen
MEP, Marta Andreason, Christopher Arkle FTCA and the US and UK intelligence
sources special to the Editor, Christopher Story.
further details, see Ashley Mote’s website: www.ashleymote.co.uk.
VOL. 30 NO 4
[extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by
was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on
10th October 2005
Banks, Corporations and other
entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd
serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our
website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel
www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable
subscription ordering system.
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT
global journal specialising in international currency, financial and
economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.
since 1969, it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance
structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is
swamping all other considerations.
The Journal is one of a series
of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be
found on our website:
Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper
Echelon’global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’
structure with which we are all familiar.
The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a
‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised
by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored
fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars
[Font altered-bolding &
underlining used-comments in brackets]
* * *
THE NEW UNDERWORLD ORDER
*Published by: EDWARD HARLE LTD
(Source of ‘politically incorrect’ intelligence books.
108 Horseferry Road,
Westminster, LONDON SW1P 2EF
Orders@edwardharle.com . Tel-Orderline