We all need it and with the service providers
spending millions to get your business it is no doubt a competitive
WHAT ABOUT THE SERVICE
Has your vehicle been involved in an accident in the
You were proceeding along the HIGHWAY when your vehicle
was struck by a vehicle coming from a side road on the left.
HOW LONG DID YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY TAKE TO COMPLETE
We will let you know -When we know
IT HAS REACHED - 27 MONTHS
HIGHWAY Code (Section 146) states the following:
'not assume, when waiting
at a junction, that a vehicle coming from the right and signaling left
will actually turn,
AND MAKE SURE'.
are aware of a case where the accident occurred in November 2006 and IS
STILL NOT SETTLED in March, 2009
What is most
surprising about the circumstances is that there had been months of
SILENCE and then in August 2007 a firm of solicitors said they had
been instructed to take the matter to COURT as the other party contested the
claim but NO WORD from the INSURANCE COMPANY. The damage to the vehicle on the HIGHWAY was consistent with the
vehicle being struck at right-angles from the left and the final
positioning of the damaged vehicle was approximately 50 feet away
on the HIGHWAY in QUESTION.
WE QUESTION IS WHY THE EXCESSIVE TIME in order to complete on the
evidence a straightforward case
party concerned has written to his insurance company to ask WHY!
The complainant has asked us to address the
to the urgency of the matter and take off its red
and ring through to the CUSTOMER and explain WHY the MATTER has STILL
NOT BEEN RESOLVED.
concerned feels there may be some dark forces at work here?
Should there be interference with the legal process by
anyone for their own purpose we remind them that there is such a law of
both a TORT and a CRIME
conspiracy has been authoritatively defined as:
"the agreement of
two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by
underhand methods of
opponents we would not be at all surprised if their dirty tricks
department is working overtime at this crucial hour in the life of
our NATION STATE.
We will keep you
all in the picture as the events unfold.
We hope you are having better luck with
As the above case
should have been handled
A GOOD DEAL BETTER
[This could be scoop for Ephraim Hardcastle COLUMN of the Daily
Mail or a misunderstanding that has taken up at least ten months and
will no doubt reach over twelve months AT LEAST.
Unreserved Apology received
September, 28 , 2007
a any well conducted company the reputation of that company depends on
the people it employs. And the above case exemplifies what damage can be
done if those responsible for supervising its work fail to do so. The
person concerned with the above case because of the trauma of the
accident was unable to read the letter from the company but a close
friend was able to read the contents and assure him that the company had
investigated the case and had found that their normal high standard
of working practice had been in the above mentioned case had been
undermined and therefore they had sent their
It is only days since we have brought to the attention of our many
viewers the dirty tricks of those who aspire to a
NEW WORLD ORDER
of an ELITE.
So we were not surprised when we heard of the following developments
which confirmed beyond doubt that they in a colloquial way
Don'T Like It Up Them!
Since receiving the apology on
September 28th 2007 the party concerned had been in
contact with Irwin Mitchell-Solicitors who we believe have links with
Cherie Blair's Matric Chambers as confirmed on the
column not so long ago.
Also other correspondence has also been transacted with other associated
companies over the past twelve months and we were of the opinion that
the rejection of the acceptance of a 50% liability had been noted.
It is now Thursday 26th
March 2009 and a phone call from a solicitor at 10.30 am
acting for Direct Line has asked yet again whether the particular
individual would accept 50% liability and the complainant again made it perfectly
clear that he had from the very beginning decided it was not acceptable.
The person contacted remembered the voice of the contact and asked had
he dealt with the case during the time when the case was not dealt with
in Direct Lines usual efficient manner and he replied that he was in
fact the person concerned.
Thereupon he asked why the case was still at the same stage as
when Direct Line sent an apology in September 28th, 2007. He
replied that he wished to close the file and his request for a 50%/50%
settlement would enable him to do so. You can guess the answer
that he received from the unfortunate customer of DIRECT LINE.
We are aware that DIRECT LINE in a recent poll as to
service did not do so well and it is no wonder if the case above is
typical of their idea of service.
As far as we are concerned it is a politically inspired
motive involved in this case and the very fact that after months of
silence and within days of opening the can of worms about the NEW WORLD
ORDER that a call should be received by the individual concerned on a
matter which should have been resolved within a few months of its
occurrence in OCTOBER 2006..
WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED!
THE CASE FROM 2006 HAS IN 2011 NOW REACHED A 70% LIABILITY ON THE OTHER
DRIVER -RAISED FROM 50% AND THE MATTER IS STILL WITH THE OMBUDSMAN.