SUPPORT for SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE is HIGHER in ENGLAND than SCOTLAND?
The real winner of an SNP victory this
week would be
[Daily Mail-April 30-2007]
TOMORROW, [ May 1-2007] it will be 300
years to the day since
ENGLAND and SCOTLAND
Act of Union
-the historic merger between two
nations from which the
-came into being.
Two days later, that
-may be served notice of its imminent
From the start, there were warnings
that devolution would set the UK on an inexorable path to its own
break-up - particularly in
where nationalist passions were
grounded in an already separate legal and administrative system. Such
concerns were roundly dismissed. On the contrary, ministers said,
devolution would kill any push for
This week we may see that glib
assumption finally blow up in the
If the opinion polls are to be believed
SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY
-which is committed to
INDEPENDENCE FOR SCOTLAND
-stands to become the largest party in
-and its leader,
Scotland's First Minister.
If this does happen, it will not be
because the Scots are voting for independence but because of a terminal
revulsion against the Labour Government [ironically a Scottish Cabal] at
-over a range of issues from the
CASH for PEERAGES
On all this dissatisfaction, Alex
Salmond has capitalised with great shrewdness.
Playing up Labour's alleged crimes, he
has at the same time played down fears associated with the proposed
He has promised a referendum on
-and scaled down his rhetoric from
bellicose Anglophobia to declaring that an
He has even suggested that an
-would remain a loyal subject of the
Some might find such touching effusions
simply incredible; but the fact remains that Mr Salmond has skilfully
transformed his image from
BRAVE HEART WARRIOR
As a result, although opinion polls
suggest that fewer that one third of Scottish voters want an independent
Scotland, they may now regard Mr Salmond as a safe enough repository for
-to put him into office as their
Of, course, this may not happen. But if
it does, the potential implications for British politics are seismic.
Labour will lose not just Scottish
Executive seats but its national power base. For its strength as a
national political party derives from its representation in
-where the vast majority of MPs are
Gordon Brown, meanwhile, will have lost
the country which has been regarded as his personal fiefdom and where so
many of his placemen have been put into
POSITIONS OF POWER
-if he can't even win in his own
backyard, his party will be asking
HOW IS HE GOING TO WIN IN THE REST
OF THE COUNTRY?
At the very moment he finally comes
into his longed-for
he will lose the basis of his
Indeed, the fact that he is so
determined above all else to become
-has confirmed many Scots in their
THAT HE HAS BETRAYED HIS ORIGINS.
Worse still, such a result would bring
an uncomfortable anomaly into potentially lethal focus.
To have Scottish MPs voting on
-while English MPS can no longer
vote on policies for
(as is currently the case in many areas
Labour MP Tam Dalyell
first posed it as
'West Lothian question'
To have a Scot, elected by a
Scottish constituency, as
-while the SNP is in power in
-on a platform of
-will propel this unresolved
conundrum to the top of the political agenda.
Prime Minister Brown will be seen as
floating in the political firmament without visible means of support
- the tartan grin on the face of the disappearing
British Cheshire Cat.
It will also put rocket fuel behind the
The canny Mr Salmond will magnify every possible Scottish
disadvantage and grievance, putting Prime Minister Brown on the back
foot at every opportunity. And if Scotland did eventually vote for
-that would simply spell the end
of Labour's prospects of
FORMING ANOTHER GOVERNMENT.
The Tories, however have always refused to regard
as the key to political heaven on the grounds that the
break-up of the UK would be catastrophic.
BUT WOULD IT?
[Certainly now after the reign of the Tartan Cabal
over the last ten years. We would be eternally grateful to the Scottish
people if they put that rogue band of disreputable unprincipled war
mongers and destroyers of the
Maybe Mr Putin will be of help in the
Over five centuries ago the Crown had
discovered that parliament could be used as a revolutionary engine of
despotic authority under constitutional forms and so it has been under
the Blairite rule with their Orders in Council and disregard for
the expected integrity of the high offices of Prime Minister -
Chancellor and Attorney General -all of which have been
shamelessly polluted beyond recognition over the past ten years.
At least with the Tudors they were champions of their
country's FREEDOM and it was only the Stuarts particularly Charles I and
James II who sold their country to France . Over the past ten years King
Tony has been selling OUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER instead of
protecting OUR CONSTITUTION he has been DESTROYING IT.
What ever fault can be found of the Russian leader Putin
he is passionate about his defence of his people and country. For that
he can be forgiven much. He had every right to execute his traitors but
to do so in England was a great mistake as one day he may need
protection in our country for what ever reason. Treason in England is no
longer an offence as far as the numerous traitors who have over 50 years
been plotting to give away our country to a
The big mistake of New Labour
was in the words of eminent 20th century constitutional
'Their fault lay in abusing these rights, in supporting
the abuse by straining the law and perverting custom, and in ignoring
the fact that rights, so abused and so defended, cannot be maintained.
Thus ,instead of leading a gradual and peaceful evolution they hurried
on a violent collision, which, from the very nature of their power as
explained above, could not but be fatal to them
IN THE END.'
In conclusion we refer to one of our greatest
parliamentarians of the 18th century Edmund Burke
'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows
in every soil'
'The greater the power the greater the abuse'
Let's find out what everyone is doing,
And then stop them doing it.
A.P. Herbert MP (1890-19710
BIG BROTHER is watching you
George Orwell- (1903-1950)
Does it matter? - losing your legs?...
For people will always be kind.
Siegfried Sassoon (1886-1967)
In conclusion the Executive failed to
take the majority of the population with them - instead using deceit and
lies and spin to achieve their aim and regrettably the majority of our
Members of Parliament in both Houses went along with them.]
The economics are complicated, but a split is unlikely to
be to Scotland's advantage. It would lose its massive subsidy from the
North Sea oil is likely to be less to its advantage than
it thinks since -apart from the fact that oil revenues are declining - a
significant chunk of the North Sea lies off the coast of England and
would therefore be deemed to be
-in International Law.
And Scotland is unlikely to become a Celtic tiger economy
given its chronic culture of welfarism and the top-heavy public sector.
As Scotland's taxes would inevitably rise, English taxes would fall,
leaving many individuals and businesses significantly better off.
[Well! - the Royal Bank of Scotland we hear is
supportive of an
There must be many enterprising Scotsmen and women around
the world who we feel would consider it their duty to do what they could
for their future
Mr Salmond said yesterday that an
could always subsequently change its
mind and vote to rejoin the UK.
[Well! if Scotland became Independent
then their would be
would have its
This presupposes England would want Scotland back.
WHY EVER SHOULD IT?
[Because the safety of the whole
island depends on mutual agreement
DEFENCE and FOREIGN AFFAIRS.]
Many in England would breath a sign of relief to be rid
of such grasping resentment and outright anti-English hatred.
It is true that Britain's power in the world was created
by harnessing the genius of the two nations which between them produced
AND RAN THE
But within Britain, England was always the dominant
British culture has always been dominated by the
It was the
ENGLISH COMMON LAW
LIBERTY and DEMOCRACY
based in the
England's sense of its own destiny to civilise the world
dates back more than 1000 years.
Englishness has always been understated. But if Scotland
sets itself on the road to
-this will almost certainly give an enormous boost to
It will stop being a fringe movement associated with
jingoism and Colonel Blimp and will take on instead the force of
This is already happening. An opinion poll at the weekend
suggested that support for
was now actually higher in
The fact is that the fires of
have already been lit - by the progressive undermining of
The refusal by the mainstream parties
to acknowledge this strength of feeling has caused a mass disaffection
The result is the potential rise of
extremist fringe parties which have realised they have to make it safe
for people to
VOTE FOR THEM
Its not just the SNP which has had such
a makeover - across the border the
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY
-has tried to disguise its racism
and its thuggish past in order to present itself as a respectable
Dismayingly, it too may score
considerable success this week.
The SNP and the BNP may not have much
in common, but they are both capitalising on the politics of
[One who favours or strives after
DOMINATION of a
THEY ARE A PRODUCT OF A POLITICAL
SYSTEM WHICH HAS FAILED.
THIS NATION IS ENTERING UNCHARTED
We believe in a future of a
Family of Independent States
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
So You Want Out
Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
WHY WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT
When we first saw the petition we reasoned
that it had no chance of success from No 10 but we supported it
in order to gauge the number of Britons who would publicly put
their name to a list which stated that they wished to
RENUNCIATE EU CITIZENSHIP and retain only BRITISH.-THAT
IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. Some might say that to hide behind a
negative premise is both cowardly and playing into the hands of
the EU FEDERALISTS. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT- Place
your vote so ALL can see that YOU CARE. about YOUR COUNTRY and
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht
Treaty the people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was
thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be
allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so
wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted
-only such as British (not EU)
passports, driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
people want a REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a