VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     

VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

*HOME-PT 2

PREVIOUS:

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ PAGE FOUR/PAGE FIVE/

OCTOBER-PT2-2012/

NOVEMBER-PT2-2012

DECEMBER-PT2-2012

JANUARY-PT2-2013

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
RON PAUL_THE LIBERTY PARTY 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
IMMIGRATION ARCHIVE

HOME

 MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)-(1)

GLOBALIZATION

NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
 
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control

INTERNET

CENSORSHI

1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

 

(2)

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967    DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
 
 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 
     
 
 

THE GREAT DECEPTION

-THAT WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOW ARRIVING -

ONE EVERY MINUTE.

 

*

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

 

THE GREAT DECEPTION

by

Sir Andrew Green

[Former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria]

 

[Daily Mail-Saturday-April 21-2007]

 

 

To counter growing anger over the way we've lost control of our borders, the Left argues that Britain's always been a nation of immigrants.

TOSH!

Immigration today is 25 times higher than at any time in our history with a new migrant arriving

EVERY MINUTE

 

FOR MANY years now, the Government and the liberal left's case for mass immigration has rested partly on their repeated assertion that Britain is a melting pot of different cultures - or as they describe it,

'A nation of immigrants'

Our history, we have been told, is punctuated by regular waves of substantial numbers of immigrants to our shores; from the Romans to the Normans, from the Huguenots of the 16th century and 17th centuries to the Jews of the 19th and 20th, incomers have settled here over the centuries and have influenced the racial and cultural make - up of this country for the better.

The slogan was first promoted in Britain in 2001 by the then IMMIGRATION MINISTER

Barbara Roche

 who pronounced that

'the UK is a nation of immigrants'

 

This absurd claim will finally hit the dust with the publication today of an important new book

A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS?

by

Professor David Conway

Senior research fellow for the political think-tank

CIVITAS.

 

Of course we have immigrants in Britain, nowadays in substantial numbers:

Yesterday official figures from the

Office Of National Statistics

-revealed how

IMMIGRATION

has swollen Britain's population by nearly

1.500.000

 

Just in the decade since 1995.

And, of course, many of them have made , and continue to make, a considerable contribution to our life as a nation. The list of distinguished people is a long one and our country would be different and , very possibly less vigorous without them.

BUT

That is entirely different from suggesting that we are by nature, a nation of immigrants - with the implication that present levels of

IMMIGRATION

are merely, a continuation of the process that has made us

WHAT WE ARE.

Any such claim falls apart when examined closely , as Professor Conway has demonstrated. he looked at the scale of previous waves of

IMMIGRATION

and found that they were far smaller than the

MASSIVE INFLOWS

-which we are now facing.

A certain amount depends on how far back you go.

Britain has been an island for some

8,000 years

- before that , it was connected to mainland Europe.

 

The earliest population were hunter -gatherers running only in a few thousand. A big increase in population, some 6,000 years ago, seems to have been due to the arrival of new techniques of farming and a consequent boost to food production, rather than to a large inflow of people.

By the time of the Roman invasion, the inhabitants numbered some

1,500,000

[The influx which has occurred in the past decade since 1995]

The Anglo-Saxons and Danes of the Dark Ages were the most significant subsequent arrivals - yet their numbers were never overwhelming and the population remained roughly at 1,500,000

-until the

Norman Conquest.

For practical purposes, the arrival of the

Normans in 1066

is the sensible place top start an assessment of the impact of

IMMIGRATION

-on our society. To go back further is to get lost in the mists of time.

And when we look at the record of the past 1000 years, the number of people who arrived in Britain from elsewhere is

EXTREMELY SMALL

-even when you take into account the much lower populations of earlier times. Furthermore, in almost every case, their arrival was spread over decades rather than years.

William the Conqueror

arrived with

ONLY

10,000 troops

-of largely French extraction. The total number of Norman settlers in Britain was never more than 5 per cent of the population, but they seized the levers of power and grabbed a third of the island.

In the subsequent 1,000 years there have been only two numerically significant migrations into Britain -the Huguenots in the 16th and 17th centuries and the Jews in the 19th and 20th centuries. Professor Conway's work reveals

THAT BOTH WERE SURPRISINGLY LIMITED IN SCALE.

The Huguenots were Protestants driven out of Catholic France by religious persecution. The first wave came in the second half of the 16th century and a larger wave followed in the late 17th century.

The total number settling in Britain has been estimated at

40,000

-still only 1 per cent of the population

AT THE TIME.

Many brought valuable skills, some were affluent and their impact was generally beneficial

BUT THEY WERE STILL A TINY NUMBER

It was another 200 years before the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881 triggered pogroms in Russia and Poland. Between 1880 and 1914, it is estimated that some

3,000,000 Jews

-left Eastern Europe and Russia.

The majority went to the

U.S.

, while some

 150,000

settled in Britain, arriving at the rate of perhaps 10,000 a year.

They were followed in the period between the two world wars by perhaps 70,000 other fleeing

NAZI GERMANY

 

It hardly needs to be said that they have made an outstanding contribution to our society.

 

BUT

 

-again the numbers are tiny, Taken together, they amounted to roughly half a per cent of our population at the time, spread over half a century.

Professor Conway also looked at the Irish migration of the 19th century. This is quite a different case, as Ireland was part of great Britain, in full political union with England, Scotland and Wales at the time, but the numbers are interesting.

Irish - born adults living in Britain doubled from

300,000 to 600,000 in the 20 years

around the potato famine of the mid-19th century -again, some 1 per cent of Britain's population at the time, spread over decades.

Even by 1880, the Irish community in Britain was only 3 per cent of the population.

The claim that Britain is a nation of immigrants is even more bizarre when you consider that , between 1815 and 1914, Britain quadrupled her population and yet still despatch

20,000,000

-people to destinations beyond Europe.

 

The reality is that we have historically been a country of

EMIGRATION

 

NOT

IMMIGRATION

 

INDEED, that situation persisted up to the

MID -1980's

-WHEN

IMMIGRATION

FIRST EXCEEDED

EMIGRATION.

 

Why all this focus on numbers?

FIRST:

- because they disprove the Government's claim, so one more

FALSEHOOD on IMMIGRATION

-Collapses on examination.

 

SECOND:

-because numbers do matter.

 

AND THE LARGER THEY ARE -THE MORE THEY MATTER.

 

THIRD:

-because, although it may not be politically correct to say so,

 

CULTURE MATTERS TOO.

The Huguenots and the Jews were both of European, Judeo Christian culture and so more easily integrated into

OUR SOCIETY.

We are taking large numbers from cultures very distant from our own and from each other.

Unlike the U. S. -which is indeed a

NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

-we have no mechanisms for absorbing such a mix of people

The concept of

'MULTICULTURALISM'

-allowing different groups of immigrants to pursue their own cultural agenda without regard to the indigenous population was an attempt to avoid the issue.

Its disastrous failure was demonstrated on 7/7 in the London Tube bombings carried out by men brought up in Britain.

[Which reminds us that after such long investigation our Security Services have still not apprehended the Mr BIG who is either in BERLIN or MADRID]

Consider the present position. In the two years 2004 and 2005 foreign immigration totalled about 630,000 or just over 1 per cent of our record population of

60,000,000

The only two previous significant waves of foreign immigration in the past

1,000 years

-the Huguenots and the Jews -each amounted to less than 1 per cent

SPREAD OVER UP TO 50 YEARS

 

So the inflow now is some

25 TIMES ANY PREVIOUS LEVEL

 

Such numbers are, of course, having a huge impact on our society. The growth of our minority ethnic communities illustrates the point. By no means all of them are immigrants, since about half were born and brought up here and are British as anyone else.

But their parents and grandparents were immigrants, so their numbers are some measure of the impact of immigration on our society over the past half -century.

In 1951, ethnic minorities  were 1 per cent of our population

 

THEY ARE NOW

8 per cent

[and growing fast]

And in State secondary schools they number

17 per cent

[and growing fast]

To these , of course, should be added immigrants who are not part of the black and minority ethnic communities -notably, in recent years the Poles.

Meanwhile, in Greater London, one child in two is born to a foreign mother and in several of our cities, the indigenous community will find themselves a minority before very long.

[And to think that it is in the main a Tartan Cabal which has made such a mess, which has ,and will , have extreme consequences in the years ahead. We have today in 2007 - No-GO Areas in which the police have decided to leave to their community leaders to govern in their own ways.

WHAT A FINE MESS YOU HAVE GOT US IN  MR BLAIR BUT THEN YOU HAVE NEVER CONSIDERED THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS -HAVE YOU?]

Small wonder that there is widespread public concern, that two-thirds of us feel

OUR [CHRISTIAN] CULTURE

-is under threat

-and that 83 per cent want firm action from the GOVERNMENT

[This very problem was identified many decades ago but it was ignored and as we live in a country that considers

PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

-good enough for Scottish Parliament and -for Welsh Assembly and even for IRAQ but not for

ENGLAND.

We see the dramatic events in France where over 85 % have voted -WHY -because they

CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

We let all this happen because we did not believe that our cosy tripartite cabal in Westminster could be so politically -correct to have allowed the swamping of our country by millions of our fellow citizens who have

NOTHING IN COMMON

with their benefactors and in fact wish openly to declare that their culture will drive ours to oblivion and the inactions of governments over the decades has confirmed -JUST THAT.

Prior to the 1997 General Election  I scribbled some comments about the state of

OUR COUNTRY -NOT THEIRS

On the subject of the obvious divided kingdom -I'm not at this time referring to our close neighbours to the West of North but to the countless people who have found a home in our Island but have

NO INTENTION TO INTEGRATE

Our opinion has always been that it matters not where people come from so long as they are prepared to integrate -it still is -of course as the article above has plainly shown

IT IS A MATTER OF NUMBERS.

Well referring to my scribbling exercise I wrote that the mix in a nation state can be summed up in a dish of food -it is a matter of the ingredients being used in the correct amount and cooked  correctly in order to obtain the supreme effect.

The ingredients are our generally invited or agreed visitors to join us and the cooking is a matter for the government of the day.

WE HAVE  BEEN FAILED ON BOTH COUNTS

*

Why is it, then ,that the Government is deliberately perpetuating the ridiculous

MYTH

-that we are a nation of immigrants?

ITS TRACK RECORD SHOULD TELL US THE ANSWER:

IF YOU CAN'T SOLVE A PROBLEM

SPIN IT

 

[And for the past ten years they are supreme masters at it - nothing else mind you such as good governance that would be asking for too much -though their recent attempt to stop the Press from using the

 Freedom of Information Act

in order to prevent more searching questions as to their expenses and associated matters shows how arrogant the 99% members of the  Commons have become in voting to

'CLOSE THAT DOOR'.

IT is the lowest level of debasement and chicanery that those MPs have reached apart of course the vote to invade a sovereign nation-state which was

NO THREAT

TO US. 

We have said on a number of occasions that we needed a patriotic dictator for just 6 months with full Cromwellian powers to sack the greater number of parliamentarians and civil servants and the politically-correct police and many others throughout central and local government and send them to an Islamic country in order for them to try their diversity - equalitarian polices with their health & safety and gender workshops and their discredited multiculturalism. They would be locked up within days and many of them would never see the light of day again.

What a lot of idiots we have all been to have tolerated such mindless drivel particularly as the Left have now -too late-admitted they were wrong in so many ways. The damage these irresponsible mindless creatures have done will affect our once free country for decades to come. 

A visit to countries which intend to dominate our cultural landscape would soon put many of these do-gooders in a spin. but of course they have no intention of pointing out the shocking discoveries because they get more of a thrill in dictating their asinine policies to the laid back people back home in the UK.

What happens in other countries is the concern of those countries provided they are no direct threat to us. The greatest threat we face is from those pompous individuals at home and a number from overseas who have prospered by constantly tell us that we are racist, whereas apart from some extremists the country is the most tolerant in the world though the actions of New Labour have driven many from every political party in the country to say

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH.]

THERE!

What has happened - quite simply, indeed undeniably - is that the Government has

LOST CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS

Ministers have no idea

 

WHO HAS COME?

AND

WHO HAS GONE

AND

WHO IS STILL HERE?

They were far too slow to tackle the asylum mess which they inherited from the

CONSERVATIVES.

Then they deliberately and , in my view, crazily made a massive increase in work permits followed by an appalling miscalculation over the likely inflows from

EASTERN EUROPE.

So, prevented by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-from addressing the root of the problem - which is the

SCALE of IMMIGRATION

THEY REACHED FOR THE SPIN!

We were repeatedly told that none of this mattered because we are a

NATION of IMMIGRANTS?

ANYWAY -a nation that has successfully absorbed immigration down the centuries

THAT LINE HAS BEEN SHOT TO PIECES

by

Professor Conway

 

The Government is now left with its second defence - that all this immigration is

BENEFICIAL

-even necessary , for our economy. Two -thirds of the public

DO NOT BELIEVE IT

-but the Government continues to repeat it. The public are, of course

RIGHT!

 

Nearly all the benefit of

IMMIGRATION

-goes to the immigrants themselves - which is

WHY THEY COME

The Government claims that the entire country benefits from the growth in our economy as a result of

IMMIGRATION

-but calculations based on its own figures show that the value of this growth to each member of the

INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY

-comes to less than

50p a week.

 

NOT A LOT, YOU MAY THINK

-when you consider the added cost to the economy caused by current levels of

IMMIGRATION

-cost in the form of extra pressure on

PUBLIC SERVICES and INFRASTRUCTUIRE

Indeed , the latest figures issued by the Government itself show that we shall need to build

200 houses a day- every day, for the next 20 years just to house new immigrants

NOT EXISTING IMMIGRANTS

BUT

NEW ONES

This takes no account of the illegal immigrants, who must number at least

500,000

 

Fortunately the Public is waking up to the situation.

The chattering classes are still not too bothered. They like the cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and lower inflation that the lower wages of immigrants bring.

But for the working class that means

LESS MONEY  and LESS JOB SECURITY

THEY ARE NOT AMUSED

Indeed, the white working class who are the most directly affected by mass immigration are beginning to desert

NEW LABOUR  IN DROVES

 

This may be why the Government is at least taking  action. Liam Byrne, Barbara Roche's successor as

MINSTER FOR IMMIGRATION

admitted this week that the country is 'deeply unsettled' by the present massive levels of

IMMIGRATION.

[Well-it is only just over a week to New Labour sufferings the biggest defeat -ever.]

Only last month, and just in time for the local elections, the Home office issued two documents setting out how it intends to restore

CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS

-with better records of arrivals and departures, new visa controls, ID cards for resident foreigners and new measures against employers of illegal workers.

This is all sensible stuff and long overdue - but whether the Home Office has staff of sufficient quality

[Staff diversity? To New Labour it means lowering the standards to meet the mean -not to reach the best level possible.]

- and the resources necessary to achieve their aims -

REMAINS TO BE SEEN.

THE TRUTH IS THAT WE CANNOT CONTINUE AS WE ARE.

Migrants are now arriving at very nearly

ONE A MINUTE

We cannot possibly integrate people into our society at such a pace, and we should not be expected to do so.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MUST BE PUT ASIDE.

[Well New Labour are not concerned - they are the flexible friend to the newcomer and they want their vote-even now -even more.]

There  must be a sharp reduction in

IMMIGRATION

The public must be reassured by clear evidence that the situation is no longer spinning

OUT OF CONTROL

THe best objective would be to reduce foreign immigration to the same level as the number of British people emigrating each year. this has doubled under the present Government to about

100,000 a year

[This remark requires a condition that ONLY those who are able

TO INTEGRATE

should be considered.

[TO have a 100,000 patriotic citizens  leaving  the UK and then to receive in return a large number of newcomers who have NO INTENTION TO INTEGRATE is NO POLICY AT ALL]

Such a limit would allow room for those who are really essential to our economy ,as well as leaving room for family reunion (under tightened rules). Genuine refuges should not, as a matter of principle be capped. In any case, they nowadays number fewer than 10,000 a year.

*

 

[We are concerned about the above open -ended suggestion because in the present climate of our over-populated country with millions too many for our infrastructure to cope with. Until there is a drastic reduction in those finding a home here there can be NO open-door policy for even genuine refugees because in the early years 21st century there has been so many destructive wars that to have an open policy would be to the detriment of those who have joined us and of course to the indigenous population at large.]

 

As the above article has clearly shown we have on occasions accepted large numbers of

REFUGEES

-but also as shown it was over decades nor just a few years-until the curse of Blairdom brought us nation destroying schemes which have damaged our communities and country.]

*

Firm and effective action is the only way forward. Spin has had its day. And professor Conway has made a valuable contribution

TO ITS DEMISE.

 

*

 

A Nation of Immigrants?

by David Conway

is available from

www.Civitas,org.uk

£10 including p&p

*

Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and a former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria,

 

 

*

 

How could a Multicultural Britain WORK?

*

HOW MANY MORE CAN BRITAIN TAKE by Sir Andrew Green

*

MULTICULTURAL policies have effectively divided the POPULATION into ETHNIC and FAITH communities.

*

TRUE POPULATION TOTAL ON OUR CROWDED ISLAND IS NEARER 61.5 MILLION

*

GET BRITISH OR GET OUT OF THE COUNTRY

 

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE -TOLERANT-NOT MULTICULTURAL

*

 

[There are many more bulletins on this subject on our bulletin board]

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

*

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

 

 
     
 

EU

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 
 

HOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
 
 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 
 

HOME

 
     
 
 

THE GREAT DECEPTION

-THAT WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOW ARRIVING -

ONE EVERY MINUTE.

 

*

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

 

THE GREAT DECEPTION

by

Sir Andrew Green

[Former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria]

 

[Daily Mail-Saturday-April 21-2007]

 

 

To counter growing anger over the way we've lost control of our borders, the Left argues that Britain's always been a nation of immigrants.

TOSH!

Immigration today is 25 times higher than at any time in our history with a new migrant arriving

EVERY MINUTE

 

FOR MANY years now, the Government and the liberal left's case for mass immigration has rested partly on their repeated assertion that Britain is a melting pot of different cultures - or as they describe it,

'A nation of immigrants'

Our history, we have been told, is punctuated by regular waves of substantial numbers of immigrants to our shores; from the Romans to the Normans, from the Huguenots of the 16th century and 17th centuries to the Jews of the 19th and 20th, incomers have settled here over the centuries and have influenced the racial and cultural make - up of this country for the better.

The slogan was first promoted in Britain in 2001 by the then IMMIGRATION MINISTER

Barbara Roche

 who pronounced that

'the UK is a nation of immigrants'

 

This absurd claim will finally hit the dust with the publication today of an important new book

A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS?

by

Professor David Conway

Senior research fellow for the political think-tank

CIVITAS.

 

Of course we have immigrants in Britain, nowadays in substantial numbers:

Yesterday official figures from the

Office Of National Statistics

-revealed how

IMMIGRATION

has swollen Britain's population by nearly

1.500.000

 

Just in the decade since 1995.

And, of course, many of them have made , and continue to make, a considerable contribution to our life as a nation. The list of distinguished people is a long one and our country would be different and , very possibly less vigorous without them.

BUT

That is entirely different from suggesting that we are by nature, a nation of immigrants - with the implication that present levels of

IMMIGRATION

are merely, a continuation of the process that has made us

WHAT WE ARE.

Any such claim falls apart when examined closely , as Professor Conway has demonstrated. he looked at the scale of previous waves of

IMMIGRATION

and found that they were far smaller than the

MASSIVE INFLOWS

-which we are now facing.

A certain amount depends on how far back you go.

Britain has been an island for some

8,000 years

- before that , it was connected to mainland Europe.

 

The earliest population were hunter -gatherers running only in a few thousand. A big increase in population, some 6,000 years ago, seems to have been due to the arrival of new techniques of farming and a consequent boost to food production, rather than to a large inflow of people.

By the time of the Roman invasion, the inhabitants numbered some

1,500,000

[The influx which has occurred in the past decade since 1995]

The Anglo-Saxons and Danes of the Dark Ages were the most significant subsequent arrivals - yet their numbers were never overwhelming and the population remained roughly at 1,500,000

-until the

Norman Conquest.

For practical purposes, the arrival of the

Normans in 1066

is the sensible place top start an assessment of the impact of

IMMIGRATION

-on our society. To go back further is to get lost in the mists of time.

And when we look at the record of the past 1000 years, the number of people who arrived in Britain from elsewhere is

EXTREMELY SMALL

-even when you take into account the much lower populations of earlier times. Furthermore, in almost every case, their arrival was spread over decades rather than years.

William the Conqueror

arrived with

ONLY

10,000 troops

-of largely French extraction. The total number of Norman settlers in Britain was never more than 5 per cent of the population, but they seized the levers of power and grabbed a third of the island.

In the subsequent 1,000 years there have been only two numerically significant migrations into Britain -the Huguenots in the 16th and 17th centuries and the Jews in the 19th and 20th centuries. Professor Conway's work reveals

THAT BOTH WERE SURPRISINGLY LIMITED IN SCALE.

The Huguenots were Protestants driven out of Catholic France by religious persecution. The first wave came in the second half of the 16th century and a larger wave followed in the late 17th century.

The total number settling in Britain has been estimated at

40,000

-still only 1 per cent of the population

AT THE TIME.

Many brought valuable skills, some were affluent and their impact was generally beneficial

BUT THEY WERE STILL A TINY NUMBER

It was another 200 years before the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881 triggered pogroms in Russia and Poland. Between 1880 and 1914, it is estimated that some

3,000,000 Jews

-left Eastern Europe and Russia.

The majority went to the

U.S.

, while some

 150,000

settled in Britain, arriving at the rate of perhaps 10,000 a year.

They were followed in the period between the two world wars by perhaps 70,000 other fleeing

NAZI GERMANY

 

It hardly needs to be said that they have made an outstanding contribution to our society.

 

BUT

 

-again the numbers are tiny, Taken together, they amounted to roughly half a per cent of our population at the time, spread over half a century.

Professor Conway also looked at the Irish migration of the 19th century. This is quite a different case, as Ireland was part of great Britain, in full political union with England, Scotland and Wales at the time, but the numbers are interesting.

Irish - born adults living in Britain doubled from

300,000 to 600,000 in the 20 years

around the potato famine of the mid-19th century -again, some 1 per cent of Britain's population at the time, spread over decades.

Even by 1880, the Irish community in Britain was only 3 per cent of the population.

The claim that Britain is a nation of immigrants is even more bizarre when you consider that , between 1815 and 1914, Britain quadrupled her population and yet still despatch

20,000,000

-people to destinations beyond Europe.

 

The reality is that we have historically been a country of

EMIGRATION

 

NOT

IMMIGRATION

 

INDEED, that situation persisted up to the

MID -1980's

-WHEN

IMMIGRATION

FIRST EXCEEDED

EMIGRATION.

 

Why all this focus on numbers?

FIRST:

- because they disprove the Government's claim, so one more

FALSEHOOD on IMMIGRATION

-Collapses on examination.

 

SECOND:

-because numbers do matter.

 

AND THE LARGER THEY ARE -THE MORE THEY MATTER.

 

THIRD:

-because, although it may not be politically correct to say so,

 

CULTURE MATTERS TOO.

The Huguenots and the Jews were both of European, Judeo Christian culture and so more easily integrated into

OUR SOCIETY.

We are taking large numbers from cultures very distant from our own and from each other.

Unlike the U. S. -which is indeed a

NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

-we have no mechanisms for absorbing such a mix of people

The concept of

'MULTICULTURALISM'

-allowing different groups of immigrants to pursue their own cultural agenda without regard to the indigenous population was an attempt to avoid the issue.

Its disastrous failure was demonstrated on 7/7 in the London Tube bombings carried out by men brought up in Britain.

[Which reminds us that after such long investigation our Security Services have still not apprehended the Mr BIG who is either in BERLIN or MADRID]

Consider the present position. In the two years 2004 and 2005 foreign immigration totalled about 630,000 or just over 1 per cent of our record population of

60,000,000

The only two previous significant waves of foreign immigration in the past

1,000 years

-the Huguenots and the Jews -each amounted to less than 1 per cent

SPREAD OVER UP TO 50 YEARS

 

So the inflow now is some

25 TIMES ANY PREVIOUS LEVEL

 

Such numbers are, of course, having a huge impact on our society. The growth of our minority ethnic communities illustrates the point. By no means all of them are immigrants, since about half were born and brought up here and are British as anyone else.

But their parents and grandparents were immigrants, so their numbers are some measure of the impact of immigration on our society over the past half -century.

In 1951, ethnic minorities  were 1 per cent of our population

 

THEY ARE NOW

8 per cent

[and growing fast]

And in State secondary schools they number

17 per cent

[and growing fast]

To these , of course, should be added immigrants who are not part of the black and minority ethnic communities -notably, in recent years the Poles.

Meanwhile, in Greater London, one child in two is born to a foreign mother and in several of our cities, the indigenous community will find themselves a minority before very long.

[And to think that it is in the main a Tartan Cabal which has made such a mess, which has ,and will , have extreme consequences in the years ahead. We have today in 2007 - No-GO Areas in which the police have decided to leave to their community leaders to govern in their own ways.

WHAT A FINE MESS YOU HAVE GOT US IN  MR BLAIR BUT THEN YOU HAVE NEVER CONSIDERED THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS -HAVE YOU?]

Small wonder that there is widespread public concern, that two-thirds of us feel

OUR [CHRISTIAN] CULTURE

-is under threat

-and that 83 per cent want firm action from the GOVERNMENT

[This very problem was identified many decades ago but it was ignored and as we live in a country that considers

PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

-good enough for Scottish Parliament and -for Welsh Assembly and even for IRAQ but not for

ENGLAND.

We see the dramatic events in France where over 85 % have voted -WHY -because they

CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

We let all this happen because we did not believe that our cosy tripartite cabal in Westminster could be so politically -correct to have allowed the swamping of our country by millions of our fellow citizens who have

NOTHING IN COMMON

with their benefactors and in fact wish openly to declare that their culture will drive ours to oblivion and the inactions of governments over the decades has confirmed -JUST THAT.

Prior to the 1997 General Election  I scribbled some comments about the state of

OUR COUNTRY -NOT THEIRS

On the subject of the obvious divided kingdom -I'm not at this time referring to our close neighbours to the West of North but to the countless people who have found a home in our Island but have

NO INTENTION TO INTEGRATE

Our opinion has always been that it matters not where people come from so long as they are prepared to integrate -it still is -of course as the article above has plainly shown

IT IS A MATTER OF NUMBERS.

Well referring to my scribbling exercise I wrote that the mix in a nation state can be summed up in a dish of food -it is a matter of the ingredients being used in the correct amount and cooked  correctly in order to obtain the supreme effect.

The ingredients are our generally invited or agreed visitors to join us and the cooking is a matter for the government of the day.

WE HAVE  BEEN FAILED ON BOTH COUNTS

*

Why is it, then ,that the Government is deliberately perpetuating the ridiculous

MYTH

-that we are a nation of immigrants?

ITS TRACK RECORD SHOULD TELL US THE ANSWER:

IF YOU CAN'T SOLVE A PROBLEM

SPIN IT

 

[And for the past ten years they are supreme masters at it - nothing else mind you such as good governance that would be asking for too much -though their recent attempt to stop the Press from using the

 Freedom of Information Act

in order to prevent more searching questions as to their expenses and associated matters shows how arrogant the 99% members of the  Commons have become in voting to

'CLOSE THAT DOOR'.

IT is the lowest level of debasement and chicanery that those MPs have reached apart of course the vote to invade a sovereign nation-state which was

NO THREAT

TO US. 

We have said on a number of occasions that we needed a patriotic dictator for just 6 months with full Cromwellian powers to sack the greater number of parliamentarians and civil servants and the politically-correct police and many others throughout central and local government and send them to an Islamic country in order for them to try their diversity - equalitarian polices with their health & safety and gender workshops and their discredited multiculturalism. They would be locked up within days and many of them would never see the light of day again.

What a lot of idiots we have all been to have tolerated such mindless drivel particularly as the Left have now -too late-admitted they were wrong in so many ways. The damage these irresponsible mindless creatures have done will affect our once free country for decades to come. 

A visit to countries which intend to dominate our cultural landscape would soon put many of these do-gooders in a spin. but of course they have no intention of pointing out the shocking discoveries because they get more of a thrill in dictating their asinine policies to the laid back people back home in the UK.

What happens in other countries is the concern of those countries provided they are no direct threat to us. The greatest threat we face is from those pompous individuals at home and a number from overseas who have prospered by constantly tell us that we are racist, whereas apart from some extremists the country is the most tolerant in the world though the actions of New Labour have driven many from every political party in the country to say

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH.]

THERE!

What has happened - quite simply, indeed undeniably - is that the Government has

LOST CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS

Ministers have no idea

 

WHO HAS COME?

AND

WHO HAS GONE

AND

WHO IS STILL HERE?

They were far too slow to tackle the asylum mess which they inherited from the

CONSERVATIVES.

Then they deliberately and , in my view, crazily made a massive increase in work permits followed by an appalling miscalculation over the likely inflows from

EASTERN EUROPE.

So, prevented by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-from addressing the root of the problem - which is the

SCALE of IMMIGRATION

THEY REACHED FOR THE SPIN!

We were repeatedly told that none of this mattered because we are a

NATION of IMMIGRANTS?

ANYWAY -a nation that has successfully absorbed immigration down the centuries

THAT LINE HAS BEEN SHOT TO PIECES

by

Professor Conway

 

The Government is now left with its second defence - that all this immigration is

BENEFICIAL

-even necessary , for our economy. Two -thirds of the public

DO NOT BELIEVE IT

-but the Government continues to repeat it. The public are, of course

RIGHT!

 

Nearly all the benefit of

IMMIGRATION

-goes to the immigrants themselves - which is

WHY THEY COME

The Government claims that the entire country benefits from the growth in our economy as a result of

IMMIGRATION

-but calculations based on its own figures show that the value of this growth to each member of the

INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY

-comes to less than

50p a week.

 

NOT A LOT, YOU MAY THINK

-when you consider the added cost to the economy caused by current levels of

IMMIGRATION

-cost in the form of extra pressure on

PUBLIC SERVICES and INFRASTRUCTUIRE

Indeed , the latest figures issued by the Government itself show that we shall need to build

200 houses a day- every day, for the next 20 years just to house new immigrants

NOT EXISTING IMMIGRANTS

BUT

NEW ONES

This takes no account of the illegal immigrants, who must number at least

500,000

 

Fortunately the Public is waking up to the situation.

The chattering classes are still not too bothered. They like the cheap nannies, cheaper restaurants and lower inflation that the lower wages of immigrants bring.

But for the working class that means

LESS MONEY  and LESS JOB SECURITY

THEY ARE NOT AMUSED

Indeed, the white working class who are the most directly affected by mass immigration are beginning to desert

NEW LABOUR  IN DROVES

 

This may be why the Government is at least taking  action. Liam Byrne, Barbara Roche's successor as

MINSTER FOR IMMIGRATION

admitted this week that the country is 'deeply unsettled' by the present massive levels of

IMMIGRATION.

[Well-it is only just over a week to New Labour sufferings the biggest defeat -ever.]

Only last month, and just in time for the local elections, the Home office issued two documents setting out how it intends to restore

CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS

-with better records of arrivals and departures, new visa controls, ID cards for resident foreigners and new measures against employers of illegal workers.

This is all sensible stuff and long overdue - but whether the Home Office has staff of sufficient quality

[Staff diversity? To New Labour it means lowering the standards to meet the mean -not to reach the best level possible.]

- and the resources necessary to achieve their aims -

REMAINS TO BE SEEN.

THE TRUTH IS THAT WE CANNOT CONTINUE AS WE ARE.

Migrants are now arriving at very nearly

ONE A MINUTE

We cannot possibly integrate people into our society at such a pace, and we should not be expected to do so.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MUST BE PUT ASIDE.

[Well New Labour are not concerned - they are the flexible friend to the newcomer and they want their vote-even now -even more.]

There  must be a sharp reduction in

IMMIGRATION

The public must be reassured by clear evidence that the situation is no longer spinning

OUT OF CONTROL

THe best objective would be to reduce foreign immigration to the same level as the number of British people emigrating each year. this has doubled under the present Government to about

100,000 a year

[This remark requires a condition that ONLY those who are able

TO INTEGRATE

should be considered.

[TO have a 100,000 patriotic citizens  leaving  the UK and then to receive in return a large number of newcomers who have NO INTENTION TO INTEGRATE is NO POLICY AT ALL]

Such a limit would allow room for those who are really essential to our economy ,as well as leaving room for family reunion (under tightened rules). Genuine refuges should not, as a matter of principle be capped. In any case, they nowadays number fewer than 10,000 a year.

*

 

[We are concerned about the above open -ended suggestion because in the present climate of our over-populated country with millions too many for our infrastructure to cope with. Until there is a drastic reduction in those finding a home here there can be NO open-door policy for even genuine refugees because in the early years 21st century there has been so many destructive wars that to have an open policy would be to the detriment of those who have joined us and of course to the indigenous population at large.]

 

As the above article has clearly shown we have on occasions accepted large numbers of

REFUGEES

-but also as shown it was over decades nor just a few years-until the curse of Blairdom brought us nation destroying schemes which have damaged our communities and country.]

*

Firm and effective action is the only way forward. Spin has had its day. And professor Conway has made a valuable contribution

TO ITS DEMISE.

 

*

 

A Nation of Immigrants?

by David Conway

is available from

www.Civitas,org.uk

£10 including p&p

*

Sir Andrew Green is chairman of MigrationWatch and a former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria,

 

 

*

 

How could a Multicultural Britain WORK?

*

HOW MANY MORE CAN BRITAIN TAKE by Sir Andrew Green

*

MULTICULTURAL policies have effectively divided the POPULATION into ETHNIC and FAITH communities.

*

TRUE POPULATION TOTAL ON OUR CROWDED ISLAND IS NEARER 61.5 MILLION

*

GET BRITISH OR GET OUT OF THE COUNTRY

 

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE -TOLERANT-NOT MULTICULTURAL

*

 

[There are many more bulletins on this subject on our bulletin board]

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

*

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

 

 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.l

 

A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+

CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+

BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY

+CHANGED+THE+LAW

IN+1998.

THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+

TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+

AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME

+IS +SACROSANCT.

 

 

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reveiwed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 

 
 

HOME