BLAIR HAS STAGED A COUP -FIRST AGAINST THE LABOUR PARTY
-AND YOUR CONSTITUTION -AND THE
TRAITOROUS SO-CALLED OPPOSITION ALLOWED HIM TO GET AWAY WITH IT.
Blair's coup d' etat
This week the killing of the Privy
Council is all part of New Labour's mission to vandalise Britain's great
[Before we commence with the article we
should remind ourselves that the damage is to
for as everyone knows Scotland has its
parliament back and has always had its corpus juris law system in place.
As for Wales they have an Assembly and
no doubt in the future their own parliament.
It is this persistent reference to
British institutions by a battery of misinformed so-called commentators
on the destruction of what they call BRITISH which in reality is in fact
-reaching back over a thousand years in
the past and the
ENGLISH -MAGNA CARTA
ENGLISH - PETITION OF RIGHT
ENGLISH - BILL OF RIGHTS
ENGLISH-ACT OF SETTLEMENT
12 & 13 Will,III.c.2 (1700 and 1701)
Nowhere in this Act of Parliament does
it mention BRITAIN -we have the kingdoms of England, France and Ireland
and the Dominions thereunto belonging...
By the general press refusing for years
to name the country which occupies 87 per cent of the land space in our shared
It has been possible over 35 years and
particularly over the past 10 years of the
Tony Blair and his traitorous
cohorts to virtually achieve his objective with only one more signature
to consign a once great independent god -fearing nation-state into a
despotic - corrupt - unaccountable police state to call itself
United States of Europe.
As we are now being told by Peter
Oborne this weeks killing of the Privy Council once the "Continual" or
Ordinary Council of our earlier Kings(the source of the later Privy
Council) not only as an upper court of appeal, but as a direct court of
Royal justice in all cases which had not been specially delegated to the
recently constituted Courts of the Common Law
It has been the Press in general which
has consistently pushed the British label for well over a hundred years.
Even in the 1930's an English prime minister Stanley Baldwin mentioned
the increased habit of overlooking the fact that
THERE WAS AN ENGLAND.
Today in March 2007 whether it is the
Press or the BBC or any other body in the public eye you will observe
unless they are in Scotland or Wales their utterances are proscribed so
that the word which has been forbidden for many decades
-is never mentioned
We admire our close neighbours in our
island home and whether it is Songs of Praise or any other activity they
portray their nationalism without apology and even encroach on the
territory of England with their two language road signs hopeful that
Englishmen may learn the language and when they have no country to
defend will find the language lessons most useful in their new homes
across Offa's Dike.
Well we have had our say and will
return you to:
Blair's coup d' etat
LAST WEEK , the former cabinet
Secretary Lord Wilson made an acute remark. he noted that Tony Blair and
his New Labour faction' had staged a coup, first against the Labour
party and then against the
PROCESSES of GOVERNMENT'
I have never read before such an
accurate summary of the trajectory of British politics [English politics
as it concerns in the main that country] over the past 13years.
In Opposition, Tony Blair and his
coterie began destroying the Labour Party. The link with the Unions was
cut -Party Conference was emasculated and the once governing national
Executive Committee stripped of POWER.
After the 1997 General Election the
Blair clique embarked , quite deliberately, on the destruction of the
defining [ENGLISH ] INSTITUTIONS
-of the BRITISH [In reality the
ENGLISH, Nation -State]
THEY ACHIEVED THIS WITH HUGE SUCCESS
During ten years in POWER, New Labour
THE CIVIL SERVICE
DEMORALIZED THE FOREIGN OFFICE
SMASHED THE INTEGRITY OF THE
ABOLISHED THE ARMY'S REGIMENTAL SYSTEM.
In addition, it launched an audacious,
but so far unsuccessful, attempt to undermine the MONARCHY, and
initiated a long and sustained attack on the JUDICIARY.
[What we have to ask ourselves is WHY
the protector of the over 1100 year-old House of Wessex did NOT
refuse to sign the five EU treaties which made no secret of the plans to
enslave HER subjects into a god-less despotic corrupt unaccountable
police state to call itself the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
- particularly by the open door of the
Maastricht Treaty in 1992
And you have all heard of YOUR Foreign
Secretary Douglas Hurd being overheard saying:
'We'd better find out what we have
His colleague Francis Maud (now
the Conservative chairman in 2007) must have had no doubt a similar
frame of mind or he would have surely enlightened his counterpart of the
enormous consequences of such a TREATY on the future enslavement of the
This has all been carried out in the
name of MODERNISATION
[In reality it is the name of a future
United States of Europe and if the majority of the English people cannot
not see it then they deserve their
New Labour is distrustful of
INSTITUTIONS, and favours instead, a system of
DIRECT PERSONAL RULE
Indeed, this impulse remains
predominant and, last week, saw two fresh instances of Blairite
hostility to the
INSTITUTIONS OF THE STATE
On Wednesday, practically in secret,
the Prime Minister abolished the
The move was scarcely reported - and
not even announced in [YOUR]
HOUSE of COMMONS
-even though it
was made on a day when the Prime Minister was answering questions on.
among other urgent matters, phone-in charges for TV competitions.
[Future generations will be astonished
that their inheritance of over 1500 years in our new island home of the
original and ancient Council of the Wise of the people about the person
of the Monarch was demolished while the House talked about charges for
TV competitions. ]
Presumably the modernisers would argue
that this lack of fanfare simply reflects the fact that the Privy
Council -an ancient government office dating back to the Middle Ages,
when it comprised the inner corps of advisers who surrounded the Monarch
-no longer matters.
Although Cabinet ministers and certain
senior public figures are still appointed to the COUNCIL (which entitles
them to place the title 'Rt Hon' in front of their name), in practice,
it rarely meets and its executive functions are mainly irrelevant. But
the Privy Council still possesses one rare and valuable quality. It is
totally free from any taint of political bias, because it owes loyalty
purely to the MONARCH [And as we all know from
http://eutruth.org.uk there will
soon be no need for MONARCHY in the new EU REGIONS only identity -to be
blunt it will be the end as we see little chance that THE QUEEN will not
accede as SHE has done so far on five previous occasions to sign the
final document which will bring slavery of a once free people of
1500 years in the making within a
despotic-corrupt-unaccountable-totalitarian police state calling itself
United States of Europe
-and a torrent of thousands of new laws
waiting the final signature will cascade on to everyone and no doubt
wake up many who had other things on their minds that Tony Blair was not
kidding and with not so much as a whimper from YOUR REPRESENTATIVES in
WESTMINSTER who have no doubt already been told of their more
remunerative jobs awaiting them in Regionalised ANGLOLAND.
[It is said a PEOPLE get the GOVERNMENT
they DESERVE and from the INACTIVITY in the COUNTRY and IN PARLIAMENT we
have to AGREE.]
Mr Oborne further states that this
means that the Privy Council has been the ideal mechanism for carrying
out its surprisingly numerous residual functions
These include a judicial role in
British dependent territories; administration of the honours system;
public inquires the safe keeping of public charters; the provision of
neutral ground where political hostilities are suspended and leaders of
rival parties can communicate on so-called
'PRIVY COUNCIL TERMS'
-in other words, under conditions of
total confidence and mutual trust.
For all its quaintness and antiquity
the Privy Council has filled a vital role in our
-In its quiet way , it guaranteed (
once ) guaranteed the integrity of the British State.
[Here again we have that out- of- date
description of a landmass that is no longer BRITAIN. The Privy Council
was and is an ENGLISH INSTITUTION it is not of a British heritage which
has only been in partial existence for the past 300 years.]
For these reasons, I do not believe
that Tony Blair's decision to abolish the PRIVY COUNCIL was an accident
or even, as modernisers claim an innocent 'tidying up exercise' [haven't
we heard this expression used in the past when they are at their most
dangerous?] On the contrary ,it looks very much as if a sinister
motive underlies this apparently casual act of constitutional vandalism.
[Tony Blair is as they have said is tidying-up before he
shortly puts his
signature to the
DECLARATION OF BERLIN
-a cosy get together of the 27 member
states many of whom are determined to get an EU Constitution installed
by whatever means they can. The words no doubt will NOT mention the word
CONSTITUTION but that is
WHAT IT WILL BE!
-and after that all talk about Privy
Council or any other part of our inherited constitution will mean
We will continue with Peter Oborne's
list of destruction:
Consider the facts: the
Political Honours Scrutiny Committee is administered from inside the
Privy Council office, precisely because only the Privy Council can offer
the independence and protection need to carry out its work.
Significantly, the current
cash-for-honours investigation by the Metropolitan Police started only
after this COMMITTEE objected to some of the Prime Ministers sleaziest
recommendations to the peerage. But as a result of the new reforms, the
committee will probably be moved to the cabinet office, where
MINISTERS CAN KEEP IT UNDER MUCH CLOSER
Another key function of the privy
Council involves safeguarding the charters of great public bodies.
This means, for example, that Oxford
and Cambridge Universities ultimately report to it. Both these
world-famous centres of learning are under constant attack from New
Labour ministers, who deep dislike their heritage of academic excellence
and moral independence, and yearn to adapt them into instruments of
I have been told that the Treasury
makes regular calls to Cambridge dons, pressuring them to surrender the
university's independence. There was the disgraceful episode when the
Chancellor of the Exchequer tried to intervene in Oxford's selection
methods when he said it was 'an absolute scandal' that a comprehensive
school pupil had been refused a place 'by an interview system more
reminiscent of an old boy network than genuine justice for society'.
One further key function provided
by the Privy Council is the provision of a forum for
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC INQUIRIES
-where they can be conducted without
fear of being knobbled by ministers.
Only last week , William Hague, the
Conservative Foreign Affairs spokesman, called for a
'PRIVY COUNCIL INQUIRY
-into the origins and conduct of the
NOBODY would have FAITH in such an
INQUIRY if it was ADMINISTERED from inside the CABINET OFFICE which has
been POLITICISED in such a naked way during the New Labour years.
The truth is that New labour's attack
on the Privy Council is just the latest strike in its sustained war
against the INTEGRITY of the BRITISH STATE
[But we would say the English]
-and INDEPENDENT INSTITUTIONS
Wednesday's Commons vote on Lords
reform was another dismal calamity for British [more particularly
English] public life.
I would guess that the last quarter of
a century has seen the finest period for the UPPER HOUSE since the late
19th century (the last time it played a genuinely creative role in
The Lords have been playing precisely
the role set out for them in the text books of constitutional practice -
challenging half-baked or illiberal legislation that has been passed
their way from the
HOUSE OF COMMONS
-be it Mrs Thatcher's poll tax or
barbaric recent proposals for the abolition of ancient...
ENGLISH -JURY TRIAL
ENGLISH- HABEAS CORPUS
While the quality of debate in the
Lords is higher than ever, in the Commons it has fallen sharply. this is
partly because some of the rancour of partisan debate is absent from the
Lords. But the real reason is that the speakers include some of the
wisest and most distinguished men and women in Britain:
Former Prime Ministers
and other politicians of high rank.
(The recent DEBATE on the IRAQ
WAR, called on the instigation of the former Foreign Secretary Douglas
Hurd, was an example of excellence.)
[But as we have explained elsewhere at
the time of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty -the open door to a United States
of Europe ,this same distinguished speaker was heard to say after
signing possibly one of the most important TREATY'S in our long history
in our island home.
'We'd better find out what we've
His colleague that day was Francis Maud
the present chairman of the so-called Conservative Party who no doubt
also had no idea of the contents of the document of future slavery of a
once free people in a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
A document called the Declaration of
Berlin is to be signed by the 27 member -states on the 25th March -2007
-Yes! just over a week ahead -A document which they will avoid mention
of the word CONSTITUTION but in substance that is WHAT IT WILL BE.]
This week's vote towards a fully
elected Lords, shamefully supported by the Conservatives, means the end
to all this. The new elected house will be populated by
INDIVIDUALS TOO DIM OR DEADBEAT TO WIN
SEATS IN THE COMMONS.
-They will have nothing to say, and
will be dependent on their PARTY WHIPS.
This is a job creation scheme for
Britain's strutting political class, and it makes you want to weep.
Many commentators have expressed
bafflement at why the apparently minor issue of Lords reform should have
come top of the Government's agenda this year. But it is simply part of
Tony Blair's desire for measures that will cement his legacy before he
leaves office this summer. This destructive modernising drive has earned
him both the enmity and contempt of a long list of the most senior
In the past few months:
THE Archbishop of Canterbury
THE Chief of the General Staff
Several Law Lords
-last week-two former Cabinet
secretaries have taken the unprecedented step of publicly attacking the
Prime Minister and his GOVERNMENT.
This is because Tony Blair has done
lasting damage to this country's system of GOVERNANCE which embodies
long-held wisdoms and values that he has never liked or understood.
[And remember all this has been carried
out with Her Majesty's so-called OFFICIAL OPPOSITION PARTIES
We called for a Coup de Main some time
ago as the ONLY way to protect our valued Constitution with its Checks
and Balances but as the world today has shown that even the
Mother of Parliaments
- with its Great Charter of 1215 still
on the Statute Book has been paralysed by its inability to protect an
original institution which has offered so much hope of
to a warring world for over 700 years..
Now do you believe us that YOUR friend
Tony Blair is just clearing his desk and as you can see it has many
different descriptions while he goes on his vengeance route through
-which he does not wish to face when he
becomes possibly the new EU president of the new European Union as
reward for his demolition work to our Inheritance and once hindrance to
the enslavement of ENGLAND.
ON POLITICS AND POWER]
[Every underlined word has a separate
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
So You Want Out Of
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht
Treaty the people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was
thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be
allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so
wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted
-only such as British (not EU)
passports, driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a