BLAIR one of the MOST DISREPUTABLE - DUPLICITOUS and DISHONEST
PRIME MINISTERS IN BRITISH HISTORY
[ON POLITICS AND POWER]
This week will come to define
the final, ghastly days of Blair as Black Wednesday symbolised
When Alistair Campbell left Downing
Street in the wake of the death of Iraqi weapons expert
Dr David Kelly
-the Prime Minister's allies explicitly stated that
HE HAD LEARNT HIS LESSON
They said that there would be
NO MORE SPIN
NO MORE BURYING OF BAD NEWS
Government henceforth was to be
conducted on a straightforward basis.
HOW UTTERLY WRONG THESE CLAIMS HAVE
I have been keeping a file of
ministerial lies and deceptions, and it is bulging.
ONLY last week, Defence Secretary Des
Browne was forced to apologise to MPs after a leaked document showed
HE HAD MISLED THE
HOUSE OF COMMONS
-about plans to axe allowances to
BRITISH FORCES in the WAR ZONE
EARLIER this month, General Sir Mike
Jackson, the former Head of the Army said that he warned MINISTERS about
the EXTREME DANGER of the AFGHANISTAN expedition, exposing as a piece of
tawdry SPIN John Reid's remarks that he hoped our soldiers would return
'Without a shot being fired'
TONY BLAIR'S promise that our
under-equipped Armed Forces would be provided with whatever they needed
to fight their battles is another pledge that turned out
TO BE A FABRICATION.
BUT MINISTERS do not lie just about
Last month, in an astonishing
statement, a High Court Judge rebuked Northern Ireland Secretary
-for 'lack of candour to the Court' with
reference to a sensitive case involving a controversial political
appointment to appease the
This was a very grave allegation, and
particularly shocking directed at a Cabinet Minister.
In a Government of Principle, this
would have been a
OVER THE SUMMER, the Deputy Prime
Minister ,John Prescott, was caught out making misleading statements
about his connection with the U.S. gambling tycoon Philip Anschutz,
while the former Home Secretary David Blunkett, was exposed as a serial
liar on a scale that might impress even Mohamed Al Fayed.
BUT NOTHING comes close to the events
of last Thursday. These will , I believe, come to define the FINAL
ghastly months of the
-in the same way that Black Wednesday
IT WAS THE DAY that contained a series
of momentous events: the bombshell (and very welcome) decision to drop
the Serious Fraud Office investigation into whether BAe Systems paid
£60,000.000 in 'backhanders' to win a lucrative weapons deal with Saudi
Arabia;publication of Lord Stevens' report into the death of Princess
Diana; and the POLICE interview with Tony Blair as part of the 'cash for
peerages' inquiry -
THE FIRST TIME a serving PRIME
MINISTER has been INTERVIEWED as part of a POLICE INVESTIGATION.
ANYONE FAMILIAR with the workings of
Tony Blair's Downing Street and its careful manipulation of the
political agenda by use of a
DIARY GRID SYSTEM.
-and its careful manipulation of the
-which enables future news events to be
charted and orchestrated, will SPOT a familiar PATTERN HERE.
The PRIME MINISTER'S aides chose the
date of the INTERVIEW
-intriguingly-police sources have
stressed that the timing was left up to Downing Street - because they
knew that it coincided with the Diana REPORT and the NEWS would be
Downing Street officials however
maintained that it was purely a coincidence that the two events took
place on the same day. The trouble is the No10 has MISLED the PUBLIC so
OFTEN that it NO LONGER has the RIGHT to be BELIEVED.
SCEPTICISM is all the GREATER because
No10 also LIED, several times during the course of THURSDAY.
THE FIRST FALSEHOOD was uttered early
in the morning, when Joe Murphy the political editor of the
LONDON EVENING STANDARD
-rang Dave Hill , the Downing Street
director of communications, to check the rumour that the police were set
INTERVIEW TONY BLAIR THAT DAY
Hill replied: 'Look, nothing is
happening. I think that's pretty unequivocal.'
At 11am, at a meeting of the
Parliamentary Press lobby, the Prime Minister's official spokesman , TOM
KELLY was asked whether the POLICE had been in touch.
He replied: 'NOTHING NEW to REPORT.'
BUT at the very moment he was speaking the POLICE were INSIDE Downing
Street quizzing the PRIME MINISTER.
This astonishing and successful attempt
to mislead journalists follows a long line of examples of the GOVERNMENT
systematically lying to the Press and PUBLIC about the cash
I KNOW OF CASES where reporters have
phoned No10 to ask whether certain officials had been interviewed by the
THEY WERE TOLD
ANOTHER gross Act of Deception came in
the form of a PRESS RELEASE put out by the Labour Party on November 28 -
the day that the Electoral Commission, an INDEPENDENT WATCHDOG,
published a document on PARTY financies.
YESTERDAY [December 15-2006] I asked
Downing Street's DAVE HILL to explain his conversation with the
political editor of the
-early on Thursday morning.
'I knew nothing. I did not know
anything. I did not know that the POLICE were expected AT THE TIME,
I told him that I was prepared to
accept his comments
(although only with some reluctance,
for since he is one of three or four senior figures at No 10, and being
of Communications he
would be EXPECTED to be CONSULTED about the timing of a major event like
ARRIVAL of the POLICE.)
BUT HIS ANSWER RAISED A FURTHER
If he was indeed, in this blissful
state of ignorance, why didn't he just say he hadn't a clue what was
Hill seemed incapable of
answering this QUESTION
[SILENCE to WRONG DOING is in itself a
GREAT WRONG as the individual has the FREEDOM to make their CHOICE and
if they believe that by deliberately taking part in a CONSPIRACY by
SILENCE makes them as GUILTY as the WRONGDOERS.]
THE horrible truth is that Thursday's
episode is simply the latest in a line of
-to issue from
and his colleague
-the man who was so callously denounced
Dr David Kelly
-as a Walter Mitty character.
YET I have known Hill for 15 years and
know him well enough to be sure he is a fundamentally decent man. He
went into Downing Street
THREE YEARS AGO WITH A HIGH REPUTATION
THAT IS VANISHING FAST
Before ending our phone conversation, I
told him that he would be FOOLISH to DESTROY his own INTEGRITY on behalf
-a man who-
whatever the result of the current
POLICE INVESTIGATION mis now certain to go into history as one of the
We shall let the words from the
past give no doubt the feelings of many people of the importance of
INTEGRITYin Governemnt and in all walks of life.
more sacred but the INTEGRITY of your own MIND. Absolve you to
yourself , and you shall have the suffrage of the WORLD.
Ralph Waldo (1803-82) Emerson
'Give us the man of INTEGRITY, on
whom we know we can thoroughly depend; who will stand firm when others
fail; the friend, faithful and true; the ADVISER, HONEST and FEARLESS;
the adversary, just and chivalous; such as ONE is a fragment of the Rock
A.P.Stanley(1815-81) Dean of
'A man of INTEGRITY will never
listen to any plea against CONSCIENCE.'
Henry Home(1696-1782) Scottish judge.
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
PARK in the future
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
6 months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
[All words/word underlined have a
So You Want Out
Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
WHY WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT
When we first saw the petition we reasoned
that it had no chance of success from No 10 but we supported it
in order to gauge the number of Britons who would publicly put
their name to a list which stated that they wished to
RENUNCIATE EU CITIZENSHIP and retain only BRITISH.-THAT
IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. Some might say that to hide behind a
negative premise is both cowardly and playing into the hands of
the EU FEDERALISTS. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT- Place
your vote so ALL can see that YOU CARE. about YOUR COUNTRY and
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht
Treaty the people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was
thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be
allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so
wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted
-only such as British (not EU)
passports, driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a