ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC

PARTY.ORG.UK

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est. 1994- Polices-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links -Immigration- Archive-Top Topics and Stats 

 PART ONE -1994 -Official Website-2015 - PART TWO  

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

PART 2

RETURN TO: PART 1-PART 3

 

DECEMBER-2015

 

 

DAILY MAIL

CHRISTMAS FLOOD APPEAL

HOW YOU CAN HELP FLOOD VICTIMS

News for Daily Mail-Imagine if this was YOUR front room by Robert Hardman

 DECEMBER 9,2015

1 Cut out and fill in the coupon -write a cheque  to:

'Daily Mail Flood Appeal 2015' and post them together  to:

Daily Mail Food Appeal 2015, Daily Mail, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT

 

Name--------------------

 

Address or email:  

        

 

I enclose a cheque made out to

Daily Mail Food Appeal 2015

for the amount of: £

 

 

 

DECEMBER 9,2015

2 Use online banking to make a transfer:

Sort Code 50-00-00 Account number:20769512

3 Make a donation securely online using your credit  or debit card or PayPal account by going to:

wwwdailymail.co.uk/floodappeal

REMEMBER!

 FOR EVERY POUND YOU SEND

 SANTA OSBORNE

WILL MATCH IT!

'POUND FOR POUND'. 

 

 

 

                                                                                                

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

 

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008-2015

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasize on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006
 

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year  PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

 that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.

In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1500 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN'

 

It has been said in times past: "Turning our eyes to Holland, Genoa, or Venice, where the laws govern the poor, and the rich govern the laws [sounds familiar in 2014 with the City Mile Banksters beyond the law of the land] I am, then, for, and would die for, monarchy, sacred monarchy; for it if there be anything sacred amongst men, it must be the anointed sovereign of his people, and every diminution of his power, in war or in peace, is an infringement upon the real liberties of the subject...."]

 

 

 

[Unfortunately we could not rely on the now CITIZEN of the EU who failed to honour HER SACRED OATH given by HER at HER CORONATION.]

 

*

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS 

 QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

*

 

A WARNING MESSAGE TO

THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

2004

 

H F 428

 ENGLAND

MUST RETRIEVE HER ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AND UNIQUE DEMOCRATIC PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY OF OVER A MILLENIUM IN THE MAKING.

  TO BE A BEACON OF FREEDOM AND PEACE AND REMAIN LOYAL TO ITS CHRISTIAN ETHIC AND ENGLISH LAW IN BEING SINCE

 ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

OF

 OVER 1000 YEARS SINCE WITH STRONG DEFENCES  ON

LAND - SEA AND AIR.

 TO PROTECT  AND DEFEND THE REALM AND TO

AID THE WEAK AND JUST.

ENEMY OF THOSE WHO DECEIVE AND THREATEN PEACEFUL NATIONS

AND STAUNCH

DEFENDERS OF PEACE AND JUSTICE!

*

PEACE

'Peace has her victories, no less renowned than war.-

JOHN MILTON

*

'To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.'

GEORGE WASHINGTON

*

Peace is rarely denied to the peaceful.

SCHILLER.

*

Five great enemies to peace inhibit with us: vis., AVARICE,AMBITION, ENVY,and PRIDE.  If those enemies were to be banished, we should infallibly enjoy perpetual peace.'

PETRARCH

*

 

COMPROMISE

'Compromise [ being in the EU] is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,- too often ending in the loss of both-.- Tryon Edwards.(1809-94)Am.theol. and editor

A lesson from the USA

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that HUMAN RIGHTS [ True Human Rights in England ] have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease.  The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.[English Common Law.]

Charles Sumner.(1811-74) Am.statesman.

*

EUROPEAN UNION

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

AND MANY MANY MORE!

*

 

The NAZIS and FASCISTS who founded the THE EU and ... - YouTube

 

Video for YouTube-VIDEOS-NAZI EU

*

 

Nazi Roots Of The EU Revealed - YouTube

 

Video for YouTube-VIDEOS-NAZI EU

*

We're living in a German-dominated Europe of Disharmony - YouTube

Video for YouTube-VIDEOS-NAZI EU

*

MORE INFORMATION BELOW.

 

Censored On YouTube: Watch The New Anti-Migrant Video Going Viral Across Europe

Chris | InformationLiberation



"With Open Gates: The Forced Collective Suicide of European Nations"

is a new anti-migrant video released on November 9th 2015which is going viral across Europe, the video was

disabled on YouTube

due to copyrighted music from a French composer which had to be purged before it could be viewed again.

The short film has racked up over 2 million views in only six days.

Above is the full unedited film as hosted on Vimeo (vimeo just got taken down) Liveleak.

The film's description follows:
 

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."

- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC

You are witnessing what will be shown to future generations as the reason for the fall of an Empire.

At current immigration levels and disappearing birth rates native Europeans are destined to become a minority in their own countries within decades. This is already the case for many of Europe's largest cities.

Europeans have effectively lost their right to exist as cultures and nations in their own homelands and are facing extinction.

Millions of young Muslim men leave behind their family, pay thousands to criminal traffickers to reach the land they have been promised by European politicians illegally.

Dubbed by the media as "refugees", they cross through 6-10 safe countries to reach wealthy nations like Germany or Sweden where they hope to receive a better life at the expense of the taxpayer.

Only a fraction of them are Syrian, as they enter unfiltered, without any documents and without any legitimate right to claim asylum. Women and children are rarely seen, except in the cherry-picked sob stories of the media.

Any indigenous resistance of Europeans

[Including the

 ENGLISH

 

who refuse to hand over the countries of their ancestors to often radical and criminal Muslim foreigners is labeled "hateful", "racist", even "Nazi".

The level of cultural, moral and political subversion with egalitarian and Marxist ideologies has reached levels the KGB would never have dreamed of. Equality and tolerance are lies that serve none but a few.

The Left, mainly orchestrated by Zionist interests, is destroying our countries from the inside. Patriotism, the most basic and fundamental trait of any nation that wants to survive, has become something to be ashamed of.

Feminism has destroyed family values and birth rates. Healthy nationalism has been replaced with a culture of guilt, self-hatred, apathy, degeneracy and pathological altruism. We are told to embrace "diversity", in reality this simply means instead of just being a global minority, Europeans are supposed to become a minority in their own countries as well. No civilized society can keep up with the birth rate of third world immigrants, especially when the main goal is integration rather than assimilation. Parallel societies breed poverty, crime and radicalism.

Multiculturalism has never, at any time in human history, worked anywhere. If you believe otherwise, you're delusional. In fact it's the primary reason for every major conflict.

The crimes committed by the EU against the European peoples are directly in violation of the 1948 UN genocide convention, Article II: (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Because of this injustice, far-right parties everywhere in Europe are gaining astonishing amounts of support, becoming the biggest parties in some countries.

Any European that does not rise up to defend his country from foreign invasion because he's too scared of words does not deserve it.

We are still at a point where you will not get imprisoned for your political opinion in most European countries, but this will change very soon. Do not be apathetic, do not be weak.
Be someone that can be proud to call himself European.

*

[NOW YOU KNOW WHY DAVID CAMERON-BILDERBERGER/ILLUMINATI IS DESPERATE TO KEEP US CHAINED UP IN THE NAZI- PLANNED EU.]

 

[YOU WILL HAVE NOTICED IN MANY OF OUR EDP BULLETINS THAT CERTAIN VIDEOS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE SAME REASON AS WITH THE VIDEO ABOVE - DECEMBER 2015]

[ COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

HOW TO DESTROY A COUNTRY FROM WITHIN!

 


 


 



 

H.F.658

*

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM***NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

[THE ABOVE ARE BUT A FEW OF OUR 2000 BULLETINS-MANY ON ENGLAND'SLAVERY WITHIN THE EU .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS-TAKING A LIBERTY WITH QUOTES ETC-HIGHLIGHTED ITEMS ARE OURS]

 

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 

 

 

'Our past is embedded in our national consciousness-it asks were we come from and who we are.'

*

Almost everything which is most precious in our civilisation, has come from small states.'

*

'Freedom of speech-A Freedom which canot be abused-is not worth having.'

*

 

DECEMBER 5-2015

H.F.636

 
 

Daily Mail

 

 The multi-cultural hand-wringers sounding the death knell for

[ENGLAND ]

Britain as a Christian nation...

 

 

by DAMIAN THOMPSON

 

 

EXTRACT

Now it's official-Britain [ENGLAND] is no longer a Christian society and needs a 'new settlement for religion in the UK' recognising our secular multicultural diversity.

'Socially divisive' faith schools must be phased out and King Charles 111's coronation should be a multi-faith affair.

[Of course

Charles

will be delighted.]

That's the verdict, published with a fanfare yesterday of the Commission on Religion and Belief in British [ENGLISH] Public Life, chaired by the Rt Hon Baroness Butler Sloss of Marsh Green G B E, the First female Lord Justice of Appeal.

The commission's patrons include the Rt Hon Lord Williams of Oystermouth -i.e., Rowan Williams, former Archbishop of Canterbury; the Rt Hon Lord Woolf CH, former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales; and Sir Iqbal Sacranie OBE, former secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain.

 

Pompous

Lord Williams, Lord Woolf and Sir Iqbal are among the most distinguished representatives of ,respectively, the Christian, Jewish and Muslim communities in this country.

Life peers, Emeritus professors Royal decorations, Blimey!

These are very , very eminent people who, if they dressed up in their academic robes and medals, would look like a court of Ruritania in a comic opera. When  such Establishment figures decree the death of

CHRISTIAN BRITAIN [ENGLAND]...

*

Traditions

Not surprisingly, many of the members of the Commission  on Religion and Belief in British Public Life uses flawed logic- also typical of CLIMATE CHANGE activists. Slippery rhetoric abounds. Take for example, the beliefs of Lady Butler-Sloss, who last year quit a major government inquiry into historic child abuse, following criticism of

HER LINKS TO THE ESTABLISHMENT

She  claims that the proposed 'NEW SETTLEMENT FOR RELIGION' would add to our HERITAGE, rather than taking anything anyway.

BUT THIS IS AN ENTIRELY DISINGENUOUS ARGUMENT.  What she is proposing is such a dilution of CHRISTIANITY'S ROLE IN OUR NATIONAL LIFE that it would NEVER RECOVER - and many much-loved TRADITIONS and INSTITUTIONS would be TAKEN AWAY.

CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSEMBLIES would DISAPPEAR despite their POPULARITY with PARENTS who don't GO TO CHURCH.

INDEED, that POPULARITY baffles LIBERAL ELITISTS as does the PARENTS to obtain PLACES for THEIR CHILDREN in FAITH SCHOOLS.

More often than not, these parents are motivated by a

DEEP AFFECTION for INSTITUTIONAL CHRISTIANITY.

Such feelings are strongest in ENGLAND, where the Cof E represents the most tolerant strain of faith imaginable.

And this is an absolutely crucial point. For we've now reached a time in our history where the gentle tolerance of

ENGLISH CHRISTIANITY is tragically a LIABILITY.

FACED by the TREAT of TERRORISTS who CLAIM to ACT in the INTERESTS of ISLAM.

IT IS VITAL CHRISTIANITY STANDS FIRM

*

 

Discredited

Ignoring this, Lady Butler Sloss's secular Muslim alliance and its grand plan for the de-Christianising Britain [ENGLAND] envisages vast changes that would alter the fabric of this country's history.

The resemblance to the way the EU does things is not at all coincidental. The Commission on Religion and belief in British Public Life is made up of

 PASSIONATE EUROPHILES.

Yesterday, the Church of England was sufficiently annoyed by the publication of the report to accuse it of 'falling captive to liberal rationalism'. By C of E standards that's strong stuff.

But the worrying truth is that both the Anglian and Catholic churches in Britain [ENGLAND] are led by middle-manager types.

Neither the thoughtful Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, nor the platitude-spouting Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, have the instincts of a FIGHTER!

For those, we have to turn to others. For example the SCOTTISH CATHOLIC COMPOSER -Sir JAMES MacMILLAN, who reacted to the report by telling me: The people behind this are the old- guard liberal establishment throwing the last dice of a

DISCREDITED MULTICULTURALISM

'We now live in a plural society but our civilisation has been shaped by Judaeo-Christian

VALUES and CULTURE.

The old curmudgeons here are creating a

PROBLEM WHICH DOESN'T EXIST.

But we can be sure of one thing. Even if this particular anti-Christian report is knocked on the head. Lady Butler-Sloss and her fellow old curmudgeons will keep trying.

[TO DESTROY OUR LONG INHERITED CHRISTIAN RELIGION, ENGLISH LAW and CUSTOM.]

[The introduction of  part SHARIA LAW in 85 SHARIA COURTS  by our stupid ignorant politicians knowing there are over 3,000,000 followers of ISLAM with a 4-1 birth-rate which raises the possibility that they will have the power  at the polling stations in time to introduce FULL SHARIA LAW within an ISLAMIC STATE in ENGLAND.

Many of the indigenous population will no doubt say that this will be impossible but just as with the example above many people in England in 1972 were told that they were voting for a

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

with no political implications- no threat to SOVEREIGNTY by the Nazi Spy of 60 years Edward Heath who admitted his guilt just before his DEATH in 2005 it was a BIG LIE!

*

CHURCH AND STATE!

[What the mischievous trio above have failed to understand.]

"An alliance between church and state in a Christian commonwealth is, in my opinion an idle and a fanciful speculation. An alliance is between two things that are in their nature distinct and independent, such as between two sovereign states.  But in a Christian commonwealth, the church and the state are

 ONE! and the SAME THING,

being different integral parts  of the same whole.

* * * *

Religion is so far, in my opinion, from being out of the province or duty of a

CHRISTIAN MAGISTRATE

that it is, and it ought to be, not only his CARE, but the principal thing in his CARE; because it is one of the GREAT BONDS of

HUMAN SOCIETY

and its object the

SUPREME GOOD

the ultimate end and object of man himself."

EDMUND BURKE

Speech on the Unitarian Petition, 1792. Burke's Works, Vol.X.p.43. Ed. 1818

TO BE CONTINUED WITH THE WORDS OF THOMAS ARNOLD D .D .]

*

QUIT BRITAIN IF YOU WANT SHARIA LAW says Trevor Phillips

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

[To Be continued]

Full Article - HERE!

 

'The distinction between Christianity and all other systems of religion consists largely in this, that these others men are found seeking after God, while Christianity is God seeking after man.'

T. Arnold

 

'Christianity, rightly understood, is identical with the highest philosophy; the essential doctrines of Christianity are necessary and eternal truths of reason.'

*

'Christianity is not a theory or speculation, but a life; not a philosophy of life, but a life and a living process.'

*

' I have known what the enjoyments and advantages of this life are, and what are the more refined pleasures which learning and intellectual power can bestow; and with all the experience that more than three-score years can give, I now, on the eve of my departure, declare to you that health is a good blessing; competence obtained by honourable industry is a great blessing; and a great blessing it is, to have kind, faithful and loving friends and relatives; but that the greatest of all blessings, as it is the most ennobling of all privileges is to be a Christian.'-

Coleridge ,Samuel Taylor (1772-1834) Eng poet and critic.

*

'Give Christianity a common law trial; submit the evidence pro and con to an impartial jury under the direction of a competent court, and the vverdict will assuredly be in its favor.-

Chief Justice Gibson.

*

Christianity is the companion of liberty in all its conflicts-the cradle of its infancy and the divine source of its claims.-

De Tocqueville

*

The moral and religious system which Jesus Christ has transmitted to us, is the best the world has ever seen or can see.

'He who shall; introduce into public affairs the principles of primitive Christianity, will revolutionize the world.'-

Benjamin Franklin.

*

'Christianity is the basis of republican government, its bond of cohesion, and its life-giving Law- More than the Magna Carta itself the Gospels are the roots of English liberty.- That Magna Carta and the Petition of Right, with our completing Declaration was possible because the Gospels had been before them.'-

 R. S .Storrs.

*

'Whatever men may think of religion the historic fact is, that in proportion as the institutions of Christianity lose their hold upon the multitudes, the fabric of society is in peril.-'

A. T. Pierson

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 8-2014

H F 647

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 INSIDE [ENGLAND'S] BRITAIN'S SHARIA COURTS

 

There are now EIGHTY-FIVE Islamic courts dispensing

'justice' [?] across the UK. This special investigation into what really goes on behind their doors will shock you to the core [and will confirm what stupid ignorant P C politicians you have in YOUR once FREE PARLIAMENT.]

 Guy Adams INVESTIGATES

[We must be the laughing stock of the whole world but particularly of the Muslim World. What are the chances of 3,000,000 Christians moving to an Islamic Country allowed to practice their faith in their own churches and under English Common Law?NIL!]

 

EXTRACT

Sitting in one room, a young Muslim women tells an elderly cleric about the parlous state of her marriage to a 50-year-old-man.

'He oppressed me to the maximum,' she declares. 'He  is violent, physically, and treats me like a dog.'

The women-who looks barely out of her early 20s-describes her spouse as verbally and physically abusive about 'every little thing ' she does.

When the husband's around, he forces her to wear a headscarf. When he isn't, which is often, he likes to travel to Tunisia, where she suspects he has secretly married several women.

For all she knows, she adds, he might have accumulated as many as ten wives. Fighting back tears, as she finishes this tale of betrayal, the women glances to the cleric, who has a long white beard and sits at a raised desk in front of a bookcase full of Islamic texts.

Perhaps she's hoping for a supportive smile, confirming she's not at fault.  Maybe she's seeking reassurance that the man will hold her misogynistic wife-beating husband to account.

Instead, the elderly cleric, whose name is Suhaib Ghasan, starts laughing. 'Why did you marry such a person?' he chuckles.

Down the corridor, another vulnerable Muslim women is telling a second cleric about her ill-fated marriage. This women, in her 30's says that at 19 she was coerced by her family into marrying a Bangladeshi illegal immigrant who duly gained British citizenship) They had two children, but the relationship foundered.

"There was a lot of fighting. He threw stuff at me. He put me in debt,' she says.

The husband, to whom she gave £38,000 during their time together is now back in Bangladesh, where he's taken a second wife. The woman has not seen him for four years, and therefore wants a divorce.

But the cleric won't grant one. Instead, says a witness, he decides to 'tell her about the "scientific biologic reasons for  polygamy"'

Finally, the cleric, Maulana Abu Sayeed, makes an effort, in the words of the witness, to 'persuade the women towards acceptance of the marriage in polygamous form'.

This being the 21st century, the women isn't prepared to play ball. So she leaves unhappy.

Elsewhere , in the same building a third hearing is taking place, presided over by a much younger cleric, Furgan Mahmood. In front of him sits a nervous-looking |Muslim couple, who have several children.

 

FULL ARTICLE

[Just with these two instances we can see how the immigration laws are side-stepped and the further encouragement for POLYGAMY.  Both matters need to be dealt with sternly.

 They are making a mockery of

 ENGLISH LAW and CUSTOM.

As we have said so many times we are so-called governed by politically-correct brainless-mindless and  traitorous idiots.

WE MUST!

SHUT THAT DOOR

NOW!

 

 

ONE SENIOR CLERIC CLAIMED IT WAS WRONG TO PROSECUTE MEN THAT RAPE THEIR WIVES

*

WHEN A WOMEN DESCRIBED BEING BEATEN AND ABUSED THE COURT OPFFICIAL CHUCKLED.

[The idiot trio in the article above have brought about this dangerous and farsical and unjust practice totally alien to English Law. ]

 

*

A STATEMENT

WHAT WE NOW HAVE IN ENGLAND IS NOT INTEGRATION BUT SUPVERSION BY A FOREIGN POWER-LAW AND CUSTOM SPREADING BY THE DAY IN ENGLAND' ONCE PLEASANT ,FAMILIAR, INTEGRATED LAND. ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS MUST BE PLEASED AT THEIR PEACEFUL INVASION HELPED BY THE COUNTLESS POLITICALLY-CORRECT IDIOTS WHO FAILED TO SEE THAT THEIR COUNTRY WAS BEING TAKEN OVER FROM WITHIN. IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT IF YOU CAUSE A VACCUM OF DISBELIEF IT WILL BE FILLED BY ANOTHER FAITH MORE AGGRESSIVE-MORE MILITANT-MORE DESTRUCTIVE AND THAT IS WHAT YOU CAN NOW WITNESS IN YOUR TOWN AND CITY.  OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO ARE TRUE TO THEIR FAITH BUT AS WE HAVE WITNESSED THEY HAVE BEEN PLACID AND UNABLE TO CONTROL THE MANY IN THEIR FAITH WHO HAVE NO INTENTION IN INTEGRATING INTO A FULL ENGLISH SOCIETY. WE BELIEVE THAT ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF MUSLIMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO SETTLE IN ENGLAND AND ON THE RESULT OF THEIR FULL INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY -

NO VEILS OR BURKA

WHICH WE ARE INFORMED ARE NOT ISLAMIC DRESS-TO BECOME AS THE MANY MILLIONS BEFORE THEM ENGLISHMEN-THROUGH AND THROUGH. THOSE WHO DO NOT WISH TO INTEGRATE FULLY SHOULD NOT COME TO ENGLAND AND EXPECT A WELCOME BUT STAY HOME IN THEIR OWN ISLAMIC COUNTRY AND CUSTOM.

YOU CHANGE!

 

WE DON'T CHANGE

OUR OVER 1OOO YEAR CHRISTIAN HERITAGE-COUNTRY - LAW AND CUSTOM OF ENGLAND

FOR ANYONE!

  1. *

  2. Muslim men in some British communities are 'having up to 20 children-Sharia law allows wives... ... - Daily Mail

     

     

    24 Oct 2015 ... Baroness Cox said a loophole in the Equality Act

    was allowing Sharia courts to discriminate against Muslim

    women (file picture) - and said her ...
     

     
     

    MUSLIM GROUP CALLS FOR THREE ISLAMIC STATES WITHIN THE UK

    by Robin Phillips

    Islamic extremists are calling  for three independent states to be established within the UK.

    If the plans are accepted, the Yorkshire towns of Bradford and Dewsbury as well as the East London town of Tower Hamlets would become autonomous ISLAMIC entities operating outside the British legal system.

    The proposals were put forward by the

     MUSLIMS AGAINST the CRUSADES (MAC)

    a group that was set up last year and is led by the extremist Abu Assadullah

    The towns singled out by the group are already hotbeds of Islamic radicalism. Dewsbury was home to LONDON 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan. In 2007 There were allegations that Muslims in Dewsbury were operating an Islamic court illegally out of a school. Last year the council of Tower Hamlets was accused of having been taken over by a MUSLIM extremist group.

    the MAC group, who burned poppies during the REMEMBRANCE DAY silence, have  written on their website, " We suggest it is time that the areas with large MUSLIM population declare an emirate delineating that MUSLIMS trying to live within this area  are trying to live by SHARIA [LAW]   as much as possible with their own courts and communiity watch and schools and even self sufficient trade.

    " Likely areas for these projects might be Dewsbury or Bradford or Tower Hamlets to begin with."

    " In time we can envisage that the whole of the SHARIA might one day be implemented starting with these enclaves,"

    Ian Greenwood, who leads the Bradford Council, said people would " not allow extremists to provoke them into violence".

     

    [WHAT A MISCHIEVOUS AND NONSENSICAL REPLY so typical to avoid facing facts so common with the politically correct local  and Central Government officials who will not face the FACTS that the MUSLIM population is growing at an advantage of 4-1 and will in only a few decades be the prominent faith in many parts of ENGLAND.  Already a number of towns and cities have over 40/50% presence. The fact is that they are no doubt  that they are a FIFTH COLUMN within our country. AS we have seen apart from a few IMAMS regretting the murder of a soldier on our streets and the general Muslim population keep their heads down and we can be sure many of them are praying every day that once CHRISTIAN ENGLAND will soon be THEIR ISLAMIC STATE. As we have said for a number of years their should have been a restriction put on the number of Muslims permitted to live in ENGLAND because of the very dangers we see ourselves in today in January 2014.  One must remember that in Islamic countries they have very severe penalties against their own people apart from the way they deal with those of the Christian Faith within their borders.  The reality is that the ardent severe Islamic Faith cannot coexist within a FREE SECULAR STATE because it is alien to its own RELIGIOUS LAW.

    IT IS AN ENEMY WITHIN!

     

     

    We literally have a FIFTH COLUMN in ENGLAND awaiting its TIME! to STRIKE!

     

    IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OUR SECURITY FORCES WILL NEED GREATER FINANCIAL RESOURCES AND MANPOWER TO HAVE ANY CHANCE WHATSOEVER OF KEEPING THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION SAFE!]

     

    H F 457

     

    *

     

     

    Poll: Nearly One Third of UK Muslims Sympathize with Charlie Hebdo Killers

     
     

    A new poll published by the BBC found that nearly one third of Muslims present in Britain supported the Muslims who murdered 12 people in an attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in France.

    The poll, which surveyed 1,000 Muslims over age 18, found that 27 percent said they have some sympathy for the Muslims who carried out the murderous attack in January. When asked if attacks on those who publish cartoons of Muhammad “can never be justified,” 24 percent of respondents disagreed. In other words, nearly a quarter of Muslims residing in Britain thought such attacks could be justified. Asked directly if publishers of offensive cartoons “deserved” to be attacked,

    11 percent said yes.

    Another four percent refused to answer or said they didn’t know.

    Twenty percent of respondents agreed that “western liberal society” is not compatible with Islam, while another seven percent said they didn’t know. Asked if they felt sympathy toward those who want to “fight against western interests,” 11 percent said yes. And asked if they knew any Muslims who were “strongly sympathetic” toward ISIS and al-Qaeda, eight percent said they did.

    Some of the results seem to be at odds with other responses in the same poll. For instance, 95 percent of Muslim respondents said they felt loyal to Britain and 93 percent said Muslims should obey British law. Asked if they would call police on someone who they knew to be planning violence, 94 percent said yes.

    The poll could have some resonance here in the United States where the President has repeatedly claimed ISIS has no connection to Islam. Specifically, Obama claimed last year during a scripted primetime address that the Islamic State was “un-Islamic.” More recently, at a summit on violent extremism, he refused to identify ISIS as Islamic, instead saying they are “terrorists” with no religious affiliation whatsoever. Obama also argued that the idea Islam was incompatible with western values was “a lie.”

    They propagate the notion that America — and the West, generally — is at war with Islam.  That’s how they recruit.  That’s how they try to radicalize young people.  We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie.

    The results of the BBC poll demonstrate that even murderous acts of terror carried out by ISIS’ supporters (the Charlie Hebdo attacks) are not clearly rejected by Muslims in Britain. It also suggests there is already a large pool (20 percent) of Muslims who believe Islam is incompatible with western values.

     

    Read More Stories About:

    National Security, Islam, Charlie Hedbo, Muslim immigration, Britain

    H F 470

     

    DAVID CAMERON HAS SHOWN BY HIS COMPLACENCY AND INACTION TO PREVENT THE TOTAL MUSLIMISATION OF ENGLAND TO HAVE  SOLD YOUR COUNTRY AND CHRISTIAN CULTURE TO SAUDI ARABIA-ONE OF THE RICHEST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD- WHICH WITH ITS GREAT INFLUENCE IN THE 85 MOSQUES HERE IN THE UK HAS BY ITS ACTIONS CONFIRMED A PLANNED AND A GRADUAL MUSLIM TAKEOVER WHICH WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN A GENERATION.  TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENT  MUSLIM POPULATION OF OVER 3,000,000-WITH AN AVERAGE FAMILY WITH WE ARE TOLD OF UP TO  20 WIVES PLUS MARRIAGES IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES TO ENABLE EVEN MORE BRITISH PASSPORTS AVAILABLE TO ADD FURTHER FAMILY MEMBERS.   MAKE NO MISTAKE!- GREAT WEALTH BUYS POWER AND INFLUENCE AND DAVE LOVES IT!-AND A 20 BILLION DEFENCE (?) CONTRACT-WITH A GREAT DEAL MORE TO FOLLOW-

    DOES JUST THAT!

     

     

H.F.639

 

 
 

Daily Mail-

95% white school railroaded' into

 Muslim takeover

 by Eleanor Harding
 

 

December 14-2015

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 14 - 2014

H .F. 648

 

 

 

'

'It is because England is so great, and our love for our country is so deep and so just, that we can not only afford to dwell upon the darker spots of our history, but we absolutely require them, lest our love and admiration should become idolatrous;  it is because we are too apt to compare foreign nations with ourselves unfavourably that it is absolutely good for us to contemplate what they have suffered unjustly or done unworthily'  [P174]

 

Thomas Arnold, D. D., Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Oxford and Head Master of Rugby School(1795-+1842)

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 

OUR ISLAND HOME

 

 PART 2

...In our own island we see this most clearly: our history clearly begins with the coming over of the Saxons, the Britons and Romans had lived in our country, but they are not our fathers; we are connected with them as men indeed, but nationally speaking, the history of  Caesar's  invasion has no more to do with us, than the natural history of the animals which then inhabited our forests.   We ,this great English nation, whose race and language are now overrunning the earth [1843] from one end to the other,- we were born when the white horse of the Saxons had established his dominion from the Tweed to the Tamar.   So far we can trace our blood, our language, the name and actual divisions of our country, the beginnings of some of their institutions.   So far our national identity extends, so far history is modern, for it treats of a life which was then, and is not yet extinguished.

 

 

... By the great elements of nationality, I mean, race, language, institutions, and religion: and it will be seen that throughout Europe all these four may be traced up, if not actually in every case to the fall of the western empire, yet to the dark period which followed the fall, while in no case are all the four to be found united before it.   Otherwise, if we allow the two first of these [race and language] elements without the third and fourth [institutions and religion] to constitute national identity, especially when combined with sameness of places, we must say the the northern countries of Europe have no ancient history, inasmuch as they have been inhabited from the earliest times by the same race speaking what is radically the same language [GERMAN].   But it is better not to admit national identity, till the two elements of institutions and religion, or at any rate one of them, be added to those of blood and language .   At all events it cannot be doubted, that as soon as the four  are united, the national personality becomes complete...'

 

 

Is the government to impose its laws upon the people?   We speak of the government as distinct from the people, without thereby implying that it is in opposition to the people.   In a corrupt state the government and people are wholly at variance; in a perfect state they would be wholly one; in ordinary states they are one more or less imperfectly.    We need not be afraid to say, that in a perfect state the law of the government would be the law of the people, the law of their choice, the expression of  their mind.   In less perfect states the law of the government is more or less the law of the people, suiting them in the main if not entirely.   If it be wholly or in great part unwelcome to them, something in the state is greatly wrong [ as has been the case since 1997 with so-called NEW LABOUR and the latter MIXED BUNCH of which we have no idea what they really stand for -THEY are ALL the SAME!.]   ;and although I believe that there are cases where a dictatorship is a good, and where good laws may rightfully be  imposed on a barbarian and unwilling people; yet, as  as the rule, there can be no doubt that such a state of things is tyranny.   When I speak therefore of the government, I am speaking of it as expressing the mind and will of the nation; and though a government may not impose its own law, whether human or divine, upon an adverse people; yet a nation, acting through its government, may certainly choose for itself such a law as it deems most for the good.

 

 

And therefore when it has been said that " these islands do not belong to the king and parliament in the same manner as the house or land of any individual belongs to the owner," and that therefore a government may not settle the religious law of a country as the master of a family may settle the religious practices of his household; this is true only if we consider the king and parliament as not speaking the voice of the nation, but their own opposed to that of the nation.   For the right of a nation over its territory must be at least as absolute as that of any individual over his own house and land; and it surely is not an absurdity to suppose that the voice of government can ever be the voice of the nation:  although they unhappily too often differ, yet surely they may conceivably, and very often do in practice, completely agree...

 

... Wherever there is centralization, there is a danger of the parts of the body being too much crippled in their individual action; and yet centralization is essential to their healthy activity no less than to the perfection of the body.  But if men run away with the mistaken notion that liberty of conscience is threatened only by a state religion, and not at all by a church religion, the danger is that they will abandon religion altogether to what they call the church, that is, to the power of society far worse governed than most states, and likely to lay far heavier burdens on individual conscience, because the spirit dominant in it is narrower and more intolerant.

 

[Page46]  No doubt all societies, whether they are called states or churches, are bound to avoid tempting the conscience of individuals by overstating the terms of citizenship or communion.    And it is desirable, as I said before, to require a profession of obedience rather than belief, because obedience can and will often be readily rendered where belief would be withheld.    But as states require declarations of allegiance to the sovereign, so they may require declarations of submission to the authority of a particular law.   If a man believes himself bound to refuse obedience to the law of Christianity, or will not pledge himself to regard it as paramount in authority to any human legislation, he cannot properly be a member of a society which conceives itself bound to regulate all its proceedings by this law, and cannot allow any of its provisions to be regarded as revocable or alterable.   But no human power can presume to enquire into the degree of a man's positive belief: the heretic was not properly he who did not believe what the church taught, but he who wilfully withdrew himself from its society, refusing to conform to its system, and setting up another system of his own.

 

I know that it will be objected to this, that it is no other than the system of the old philosophers, who upheld paganism as expedient, while they laughed at it in their hearts as false.    But he who makes such an objection must surly forget the essential difference between paganism and Christianity,   Paganism, in the days of the philosophers scarcely pretended to rest on a foundation of historical truth; no thinking man believed in it , except as allegorically