INDIVIDUALISM IS HATED BY TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENTS
-RACISM ENCOURAGED BY SUPPORTING GROUP COLLECTIVISM .
*
Senator Ron Paul a
consistently lone voice in the Congress of the United States of America
becoming known as Dr No in defending the Constitution from violations
because of overbearing Presidents, wrote the following in his book
THE REVOLUTION-The Manifesto.
PART 2
He gives the example of
taxi licensing restrictions, a government policy that
disproportionately hurts blacks. But since it is not
thought as a racial issue per se, racial pressure groups do
absolutely nothing to overturn it. That's another
reason we stop thinking in terms of RACE. Consider Sowell:
Politically, however, it
makes far more sense for a black leader to fight tooth and
nail for a hundred more CETA [Comprehensive Employment and
Training Act] jobs in the Philadelphia GHETTO than to fight
for an end to taxi licensing restrictions, even though the
latter would probably mean thousand more jobs for blacks -
jobs with far higher pay than CETA jobs and of permanent
duration. GHETTO jobs are an earmarked BENEFIT, however few,
tenuous and low paid. Benefits to blacks as members
of the general public are no feather in a black leader's
cap, even if blacks are benefited more than others by
gaining access that was nearly impossible for them before
[emphasis added].
As I discussed in Chapter
5, the Federal war on drugs has wrought disproportionate
harm on minority communities. Allowing for State's
rights here would surely be an improvement, for the States
could certainly do a better and more sensible job than the
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has been doing if they were free to
decide the issue for themselves. And although people
studying my record will discover how consistent I have been
over the years I have dropped my support for the FEDERAL
DEATH PENALTY. It is a dangerous power for the FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT to have, and it is exercised in a discriminatory
way, if you are POOR and BLACK, you are much more likely to
receive this PUNISHMENT.
We should NOT think in
terms of WHITES, BLACKS, HISPANICS and other groups.
That kind of thinking ONLY DIVIDES US. The only
us-versus-them thinking in which we might indulge is THE
PEOPLE -ALL
THE PEOPLE - versus THE GOVERNMENT, which LOOTS and
LIES to us ALL, THREATENS our LIBERTIES, and shreds OUR
CONSTITUTION. THAT'S NOT A WHITE or BLACK issue.
That's an AMERICAN issue, and it's one on which Americans of
all races can UNITE in a SPIRIT of GOODWILL. That may
be why the polls of 2007 found ours the most popular
REPUBLICAN campaign among black voters.
[Can you now see that
the problems in America are very similar to what we have
experienced in ENGLAND since New Labour appeared on the
horizon with their sweet promises which have turned our once
stable society into a GHETTO mentality where each group
grabs the spoils when ever it can. It reminds us of a quote
referring to one going to litigation and how the complainant is
like being in a position of being a fish being torn apart by
two ferocious cats. Of course the TAXPAYER in 'Yuman
Rights' England as always
foots the BILL.]
*
If our government were
scrupulously faithful to the Constitution
we would not need to be
especially concerned when a person who represents a
philosophy different from our own takes political office.
Our Constitution delegates relatively few tasks to the
Federal government, so it should almost be a matter of
indifference who is elected. We wouldn't have a worry
that social policy of which we disapproved would be imposed
on our neighbourhood at the whim of a new President and his
Court appointees, or that more of our money WOULD BE STOLEN
to FUND yet another GOVERNMENT boondoggle. And
we would also be spared the spectacle of countless American
individuals and corporations frantically donating to
candidates for political office during election years in
order to reserve a place on the FEDERAL GRAVY TRAIN if their
favourite should win.
I've often cautioned
conservatives who are tempted to give MORE POWER to the
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT in general or the EXECUTIVE branch in
particular that those additional POWERS will be available
whoever takes office next - and that person may not be to
your liking. I now find myself offering the same words
of caution to liberals: whatever temptation you may have to
exceed the POWERS granted under the CONSTITUTION, understand
that they are opening a Pandora's box.
[As has happened
in England with Bush's close friend Tony Blair who is now
very close to be lording it over Gordon Brown again should
he become President of the satanic entity the United States
of Europe. We wonder if Gordon would have been so keen to
sign the TREATY OF TREASON if he had been convinced that his
old antagonist would get the top job with its increased POWER and
PRESTIGE and a PAYOLA opportunities which the PRESIDIUM
office of PRESIDENT will offer.]
*
http://www.house.
gov/paul
*
PART 3
[To follow]
*
TREATY
OF TREASON
APRIL-2009
|