MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 

HOME

 

MY LORDS-YOU ARE COMMON CRIMINALS EVEN IF YOU DON'T THINK SO.

*

Nobles who are so very obliging...

by

Peter McKay

[Daily Mail-Monday, January 26,2009]

[We have already stated that the House of Lords should be done away with and replaced by another UPPER CHAMBER on the lines of the Senate of the USA.  The present House has dishonoured its purpose to protect the Rights and Liberties of Englishmen and should be consigned to the scrap-heap. It is no longer in the New Labour phraseology FIT FOR PURPOSE.]

 

RESPONDING to yesterday's news that four LABOUR PEERS were prepared to accept money to influence business legislation on behalf of clients, Baroness Royall of Blaisdon, leader of the HOUSE of LORDS, says:

'I am deeply concerned about these allegations. I have spoken to the members who are the subject of them and I shall be pursuing these matters with utmost vigour.'

The deeply concerned Lady Royall doesn't mention calling in the police. Of course not. The nest-feathering activities of MPs and the PEERS are a matter for the HOUSE of COMMONS and the HOUSE of LORDS.  The PEERS  named -Lords Truscott, Taylor, Moonie and Snape -have done nothing illegal.

 

They are 'noble' members. If they line their pockets by using -or misusing-their position, that is a  matter for fellow PEERS and MPs to consider, not the police.

Shadow business minister Kenneth Clarke said yesterday that 'some people might call it CORRUPTION'. But -so far as the law is concerned -that sort of thing doesn't happen at the PALACE OF WESTMINSTER.

A recent painstaking , multimillion - pound Scotland Yard investigation into LABOUR donors giving CASH in exchange for HONOURS found -after interviewing the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, as well as his donors chief, LORD LEVY - that there was no case to answer. [WHY NOT!]

DISHONESTY is so unheard of at WESTMINSTER that the GOVERNMENT has fought hard in recent weeks to PREVENT US seeing RECEIPTS with which MPs accompany their EXPENSE CLAIMS, on the grounds that no impropriety whatsoever is revealed BY THEM and their exposure could well be a security risk.

One of the peers involved in the new controversy, LORD TAYLOR of BLACKBURN told the SUNDAY TIMES reporters pretending to be business types:

'I will work within the rules but the rules are meant to be bent sometimes.'

Another BARON TRUSCOTT, said his rates varied

 'between 1000 and 5000 a day.

[5,000 is a average for an old-age pension which many must live on]

LORD MOONIE - a pal of GORDON BROWN - offered his services for

30,000 a year

and explained:

The thing with the LORDS is that there's virtually nothing they can do with you,

UNLESS YOU BREAK THE LAW.  EVEN IF YOU DON'T DECLARE, THERE'S NOTHING THEY CAN DO BUT JUMP UP AND DOWN.

 [HOW ARROGANT!- HOW MERCENARY!- HOW TYPICAL!]

LORD SNAPE seems to have been most cautious, but he told reporters  masquerading as businessmen that the legislation changes they sought might be 'beneficial' and he would 'investigate' further.

TO BE CONTINUED

 

[Like so much in Parliament which depended on the CONVENTIONS of the Chamber put into place by past staunch disinterested honourable members of the HOUSE either in the COMMONS or LORDS the CONVENTIONS have almost all been discarded by the majority of TRAITORS who could see no need to protect what they themselves have destroyed but to use to their best advantage the opportunity for personal gain under the cover of a crumbling edifice of a once great respected COUNCIL of STATE of ENGLAND soon to be replaced by a FOREIGN design under a FOREIGN POWER.]

 

*

WHAT THEY HAVE NOT TOLD YOU!

The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU will abolish our Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It was clear in the Madrid 1999 party financing document, and it was re-stated in the Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European parties like the EPP will be allowed. Some politicians, like Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't wait for this to happen.

A date for the abolition of Westminster has tactfully not been given
Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's remaining powers are transferred to Brussels, and Westminster is left with the powers of a county council. Except it won't have a county, because they will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan. The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so Westminster will be a county council without a county. Anyone with half a brain can see Brussels will abolish Westminster, as it's only potential use would be as a rallying point to challenge the power of

FOR MORE DETAILS ABOUT HOW THEY CONNED YOU-GO TO:

 

TREATY OF TREASON

 

 

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

JANUARY-2009

HOME