|
MY LORDS-YOU ARE
COMMON CRIMINALS EVEN IF YOU DON'T THINK SO.
*
Nobles who are so
very obliging...
by
Peter McKay
[Daily Mail-Monday,
January 26,2009]
[We have already
stated that the House of Lords should be done away
with and replaced by another UPPER CHAMBER on the
lines of the Senate of the USA. The present
House has dishonoured its purpose to protect the
Rights and Liberties of Englishmen and should be
consigned to the scrap-heap. It is no longer in the
New Labour phraseology FIT FOR PURPOSE.]
RESPONDING
to yesterday's news that four LABOUR PEERS were
prepared to accept money to influence business
legislation on behalf of clients, Baroness Royall of
Blaisdon, leader of the HOUSE of LORDS, says:
'I am deeply
concerned about these allegations. I have spoken to
the members who are the subject of them and I shall
be pursuing these matters with utmost vigour.'
The deeply
concerned Lady Royall doesn't mention calling in the
police. Of course not. The nest-feathering
activities of MPs and the PEERS are a matter for the
HOUSE of COMMONS and the HOUSE of LORDS. The
PEERS named -Lords Truscott, Taylor, Moonie
and Snape -have done nothing illegal.
They are
'noble' members. If they line their pockets by using
-or misusing-their position, that is a matter
for fellow PEERS and MPs to consider, not the
police.
Shadow
business minister Kenneth Clarke said yesterday that
'some people might call it CORRUPTION'. But
-so far as the law is concerned -that sort of
thing doesn't happen at the PALACE OF WESTMINSTER.
A recent
painstaking , multimillion - pound Scotland Yard
investigation into LABOUR donors giving
CASH
in exchange for HONOURS
found -after interviewing the then Prime Minister,
Tony Blair, as well as his donors chief, LORD LEVY -
that there was no case to answer. [WHY NOT!]
DISHONESTY
is so unheard of at WESTMINSTER that the GOVERNMENT
has fought hard in recent weeks to PREVENT US seeing
RECEIPTS with which MPs accompany their EXPENSE
CLAIMS, on the grounds that no impropriety
whatsoever is revealed BY THEM and their exposure
could well be a security risk.
One of the
peers involved in the new controversy, LORD TAYLOR
of BLACKBURN told the SUNDAY TIMES reporters
pretending to be business types:
'I will work
within the rules but the rules are meant to be bent
sometimes.'
Another
BARON TRUSCOTT, said his rates varied
'between
£1000 and £5000 a day.
[£5,000 is a
average for an old-age pension which many must live
on]
LORD MOONIE - a pal
of GORDON BROWN - offered his services for
£30,000 a
year
and explained:
The thing with the
LORDS is that there's virtually nothing they can do
with you,
UNLESS YOU
BREAK THE LAW. EVEN IF YOU DON'T DECLARE,
THERE'S NOTHING THEY CAN DO BUT JUMP UP AND DOWN.
[HOW
ARROGANT!- HOW MERCENARY!- HOW TYPICAL!]
LORD SNAPE seems to
have been most cautious, but he told reporters
masquerading as businessmen that the legislation
changes they sought might be 'beneficial' and he
would 'investigate' further.
TO BE CONTINUED
[Like so much in
Parliament which depended on the CONVENTIONS of the
Chamber put into place by past staunch disinterested
honourable members of the HOUSE either in the
COMMONS or LORDS the CONVENTIONS have almost all
been discarded by the majority of TRAITORS who could
see no need to protect what they themselves have
destroyed but to use to their best advantage the
opportunity for personal gain under the cover of a
crumbling edifice of a once great respected COUNCIL
of STATE of ENGLAND soon to be replaced by a FOREIGN
design under a FOREIGN POWER.]
*
WHAT THEY HAVE
NOT TOLD YOU!
The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and
Lib-Dem parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading
of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU
will abolish our Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem
parties. It was clear in the Madrid 1999 party
financing document, and it was re-stated in the
Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European
parties like the EPP will be allowed. Some
politicians, like Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't
wait for this to happen.
A date for the abolition of Westminster has
tactfully not been given
Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's
remaining powers are transferred to Brussels, and
Westminster is left with the powers of a county
council. Except it won't have a county, because they
will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan.
The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so
Westminster will be a county council without a
county. Anyone with half a brain can see Brussels
will abolish Westminster, as it's only potential use
would be as a rallying point to challenge the power
of
FOR MORE DETAILS ABOUT HOW THEY CONNED
YOU-GO TO:
TREATY OF TREASON
[Each
underlined word has a separate bulletin]
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in
Brackets]
JANUARY-2009
HOME
|